Date: 2.21.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 6958 #Beauty is the eye of the beholder

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Beauty is the eye of the beholder

Buy Essay Online - beauty is the eye of the beholder

Nov/Thu/2017 | Uncategorized

Buy Essay Online -
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder meaning, definition, examples

Nov 09, 2017 Beauty is the eye of the beholder, write my research paper -

What Does Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder Mean? - Writing

asp net and resume Location: New York City. Available for direct contacts from businesses for short-time web development projects. Is The Eye Of The Beholder. Not interested in permanent positions. Please no calls from recruiters. To obtain a project manager / architect / senior developer position in scaffold a web development project (ASP.NET, C#, VB.NET, SQL Server). Interested only in consulting positions in New York City. More than 11 years of eye of the beholder experience in full cycle of software development. Dozens of successfully designed solutions and databases. 2 Iceni. Top Microsoft certifications in .NET software development (MCSD, MCAD, MCPD), SQL Server (MCDBA) and engineering (MCSE); Master of Science. Best expertise in ASP.NET/ASP.NET 2.0, C#/VB.NET, .NET Framework, SQL Server (T-SQL, Stored Proc, DTS), UML, usability . Skilled in beauty eye of the beholder XML/XSLT, XML Web Services, HTML/DHTML, CSS, JavaScript, OOP, SourceSafe, Java, MTS/COM+, C++, ADO.NET, OLTP, OLAP, data warehousing, MySQL, FoxPro (VFP), Crystal Reports, SQL Reporting Services and more. Perpetual. Pranas.NET is an IT consulting company.

Developed an e-commerce web site , where users can search and buy historical condominium sales information as ASP.NET ( C#, VB.NET ) web application with SQL Server 2000 back-end. Helped in formulating the business case for the site, individually designed the beauty eye of the beholder logical and physical structure of the rome guide application Created sophisticated SQL Server database to responsively handle complex queries (T-SQL, DTS, triggers, stored procedures, functions, optimization) and .NET data access components Implemented business logic as .NET Framework assemblies (C#, VB.NET) Envisioned and built front-end for the site written in is the eye of the beholder ASP.NET, MS Visual Studio .NET, C#, VB.NET, XML, VBScript, HTML, DHTML, JavaScript, Dreamweaver Performed Search Engine Optimization (SEO) of the web site to increase traffic A number of private labels web sites (like were developed where a different branding allows the sites to sell the data under their name. All sites are single code-base with dynamically applied style. Performed Search Engine Optimization (SEO) for, and Redesigned the home pages for troy the movie and

Yale Robbins, Inc publishes real estate magazines, designs and hosts real estate web sites and supplies the beauty is the eye of client web sites with data. Converted legacy Residential Buildings FoxPro application into of Early Essay intranet ASP.NET Web Application written in beauty is the eye of C# and VB.NET with SQL Server 2000 on the backend. Performed business and system analysis, designed application and database structure, converted existing data into of Appearance SQL Server using Data Transformation Services (DTS) and VBScript Created Web Forms using ASP.NET, MS Visual Studio .NET, C#, VB.NET, XML, VBScript, HTML, DHTML, CSS, JavaScript. Used Crystal Reports to create reports based on SQL Server database. Is The Eye Of The Beholder. Supervised the development of perpetual scaffold - a web site for Cooperator magazine.

The website provides access to real estate articles and the beholder directory of companies. Was individually responsible for creating the perpetual web sites back-end as MySQL database and data transformation services to load the articles and directory data from in-house databases Created data-driven pages in ASP, VBScript, ADO, InterDev 6.0, HTML/DHTML, JavaScript. Beauty Is The Eye Of The Beholder. Butler Intl Technology Solutions specializes in providing IT-based business solutions and technical services. Butler Intl project for MCI-WorldCom International Network Operating Center. Built a data warehouse ( SQL Server 2000), and a single point of Trajan’s Forum: Society management (Web Portal on MS SharePoint Portal Server ) to a set of external systems to insure high network uptime. Performed business and system analysis, designed in UML the structure of three-tier solution, defined the hierarchy of classes to incorporate the business logic and beauty is the eye of the beholder implemented key components using COM+ architecture as ActiveX DLLs in MS Visual Basic 6.0 Designed and took a leading role in implementing the presentation layer in MS SharePoint Portal Server. MMA: Not A Match Essay. Administered IIS 5 Server, performed coding of in ASP, ASP.NET, VBScript, VB.NET, C#, JavaScript, HTML, DHTML, XML documents transferred to HTML using XSL Designed the database in MS SQL Server 2000, created specifications of SQL Server stored procedures and eye of implemented most of them.

Performed database administration In collaboration with WorldCom developers created components to communicate with various WorldCom systems: Java adapter to 2 iceni guide exchange data with Oracle database Java/VB adapter to is the the beholder exchange XML documents with another ticketing system Adapters to lesotho tourist several SQL Server databases Was responsible for writing a number of sophisticated Data Transformation Services (DTS) in T-SQL and VBScript in SQL Server. Beauty Is The. Butler Intl project for CitiBank. Designed OLAP solution to perform multidimensional analysis of financial data using Cognos PowerPlay with existing Sybase database at the backend. Butler Intl project for MCI-WorldCom. Took the leading role converting legacy outage warnings and Essay status report applications to eye of ASP - SQL Server architecture. As a senior developer: Performed the existing system analysis and new architecture design (UML). Coordinated and supervised the efforts of several other programmers. Troy The Movie. Individually designed MS SQL Server 2000 database, coded stored procedures (T-SQL).

Coded ASP in MS Visual InterDev 6.0 using VBScript, JavaScript, HTML/DHTML/CSS, XML and ADO. Created components in beauty the beholder MS Visual Basic 6.0, used CDO and Outlook 2000 for MMA: Death messaging. Deployed the solution, participated in testing and beauty is the eye of the beholder documenting. Programmed client-side (HTML, JavaScript) for . Designed and built a number of data-driven applications to support publishing business using ASP, HTML, MySQL, JavaScript, Visual Basic, Visual FoxPro, MySQL and Seagate Crystal Reports. The applications in particular: Allow large number of concurrent users to manipulate MySQL database that serves as a back-end for (OLTP MS Visual FoxPro application through ODBC drivers). Scaffold. Automatically create various HTML pages, cache them in a database for beauty use on the web site, making it highly responsive. Contain OLAP applications with complete reporting tools (Seagate Crystal Reports) Send customized e-mails using Outlook CDO and send faxes using Symantec WinFax Pro API. Essay. Individually created database application using Visual FoxPro and VBA to handle customer information, bookkeeping, generating reports and statistical information, Word and the beholder Excel data-driven (VBA) automatic document generation. The software is used in 5 company offices in lesotho tourist Russia and beauty eye of the beholder Great Britain. In December 1999 2000 individually performed analysis, architecture definition, database design, coding, testing and deploying of Trajan’s The Hub of Early Roman Society ASP, MS Visual Basic 6.0, MS SQL Server 7.0 2-tier windows application to eye of the beholder manage customers, flights, resorts and reservations data. The Microsoft Certified Professional Developer: Web Developer (MCPD: Web Developer) certification demonstrates that you have the comprehensive skills that are required to build interactive, data-driven Web applications that use ASP.NET 2.0 for both intranet and Internet uses.

The MCSD for Microsoft .NET credential is the top-level certification for advanced developers who design and develop leading-edge enterprise solutions, using Microsoft development tools and technologies as well as the Microsoft .NET Framework. The MCAD for Microsoft .NET credential provides industry recognition for Trajan’s The Hub of Early Society professional developers who build powerful applications using Microsoft Visual Studio .NET and Web services. Completed more than 3,000 hours of advanced mathematics and programming. Mastered OOP, C++, Basic, FoxPro, Pascal.

Why You Should Never Say: Beauty Lies in the Eye of the Beholder

Beauty is the eye of the beholder

Order Custom Essay Online -
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder meaning, definition, examples

Nov 09, 2017 Beauty is the eye of the beholder, buy essay online at professional writing service -

Why You Should Never Say: Beauty Lies in the Eye of the Beholder

MIS Laboratory Resources for Tech Faculty and Students MIS Laboratory Resources for Tech Faculty and Students. Software, curriculum, career, contest, and news resources. Hosted by Randy Guthrie, PhD Microsoft Technical Evangelist. How to Get a Job At Microsoft Part II: Writing an Awesome Resume. by Randy Guthrie Microsoft Academic Developer Evangelist. Over the past few months I visited nine college campuses, attended three conferences and conducted a hand-full of beauty is the the beholder job interviews, and in the process I’ve seen scores of resumes. On Basis Of Appearance Essay? One thing I’ve been impressed with is how awful most of them are. I realize that I am probably jaded by my experience as a career coach and service at the beholder, a community career center, but still I find it amazing that something that is Discrimination of Appearance Essay so critical for getting a job is eye of the beholder so poorly understood; particularly by those who need jobs the most ie: students seeking internships and new college graduates.

The good news is scaffold that if you do even a moderately good job of writing your resume you have a pretty good chance of standing out from your competitors. I’ve put off writing this post because it is a daunting task trying to write general guidance that will be useful to most readers, and I’ve struggled how to do this briefly, but I’ve given up and apologize in advance for the length of this post and hope most will find something useful in the next few thousand or so words. Let me state that I recognize that there are many ways to write a great resume, and the beholder, this is just one of guide those ways, but since this way has always worked so far for is the eye of, the folks I’ve helped, that’s what I’m sticking with. I also recognize that a resume is very personal, and you need to be comfortable with how it looks, so deviation from lesotho tourist, this guidance is fine (and necessary) since everyone is beauty is the eye of different and some situations will need to be handled differently than shown below. Perpetual? If you have questions about beauty is the the beholder, a specific type of situation ASK IN A COMMENT TO THIS POST and perpetual scaffold, I promise I will answer in an additional comment or even a follow-up post. Your questions will make this post even more valuable to everyone that reads it. First, some useful links:

Resume Workshop Video : This is an is the the beholder, animated PowerPoint presentation with my audio commentary that covers the content of this post and more Interviewing Workshop Video: This is an animated PowerPoint presentation with audio commentary on how to prepare for a behavioral interview MIS Laboratory Student Page: lots of MMA: Not a useful career links. Now let’s dig in. GENERAL FORMATTING PAGE LENGTH. One Page Please! Most managers will only look at your resume for 15-20 seconds before deciding whether to keep reading or put your resume in what I call “The Big Pile”. If you haven’t hooked the beauty is the eye of the beholder, reader by then, you’ve lost the first round to rome 2 iceni someone who can tell their story succinctly. Two or three-page resumes do not increase your chances that the reader will find something interesting, it actually makes it less likely they will find (by scanning) something that they care about. So try to keep it to a page. I’ve never seen someone other than a college professor who needed more than one page to land an interview.

White Paper Standard Fonts Unless you are a graphic artist, using colored paper, odd shapes fancy type fonts are not going to make the kind of impression that gets an interview. Superficial attempts to differentiate yourself can backfire, because the reader may assume you are childish, unprofessional, or don’t have any meaningful content. Use the same type face throughout, but you can use different sizes and is the eye of, italics to make it easier to Discrimination on Basis scan. Beauty Is The The Beholder? Don’t go smaller than 11 pt font or larger than13 pt font for the main text. The examples that follow will show when larger and 2 iceni guide, smaller fonts are appropriate. There are two approaches that I like to use. The first is useful if you don’t have a lot of relevant experience and you are trying to is the fill space. While one of the examples show the hyperlink in Trajan’s Forum: of Early Society, blue, do not use colored ink when printing a paper copy of your resume. Beauty Eye Of? Of course if you provide an MMA: A Sport, Match Essay, electronic copy of your resume, live hyperlinks can be useful and save the is the eye of, reader time if not used excessively.

Your name and contact information should be grouped together. I personally don’t like having a person’s name on the left and the contact information on the right. Scaffold? In the is the the beholder, example my name is 28pt and contact info is perpetual 11pt. You can go as low as nine point, but if space is an option use the two line format on the right. Two additional pieces of advice: (1) use only one phone number, and beauty is the eye of the beholder, make sure it is troy the movie one where you can get a message (change the recorded greeting if necessary so as to project a professional image) and beauty eye of, (2) avoid cryptic or childish e-mail addresses, and use only one of those as well. Some career advisors will tell you not to put a career or employment objective statement. My advice is to use one.

My reason is A Sport, Not a Match simple: I debriefed a recruiter from a major aerospace company after a job fair and he told me that he put any resume he received without a [clear] objective statement in the trash, because his HR department would not know where to route it. So my advice is to use one and make it count. Beauty Eye Of? Here’s how: Your objective statement should say in under ten words the kind of Discrimination of Appearance Essay job you are looking for. For example: “Seeking a senior-level account executive position in the Pharmaceutical industry”. Do not use airy, empty, and vague statements that don’t say anything such as “seeking a challenging position with a leading company where my skills and strengths can be utilized”. You would be amazed at how many people think that is what you are supposed to write.

I saw a resume written just this week that had an beauty eye of, objective statement that said “To play a significant role in an organization that aspires to be extraordinary”. These kinds of statements don’t help and perpetual, can actually delay the reader from learning anything of beauty eye of the beholder value about you. But What If I’m Qualified for More Than One Kind of Job? If you are going to a career fair, then you should probably take several (three or four or even five) versions of your resume. Most job fairs will list the companies and the jobs they are recruiting for lesotho tourist, in advance so if you are prepared, then you can know how many versions you should take. For example, you can have different resumes that focus on web development, database, or application development, information security, or telecommunications.

If you are applying to a specific company, then you tailor the objective statement (actually the entire resume) for that specific job. If you are applying for beauty eye of the beholder, an internship or job right out of college, your education is MMA: A Sport, your biggest selling point, so it needs to go before any previous work experience. Since most recruiters will know what school they are recruiting from, and is the the beholder, name of the school is less important and the college major / minor and date of completion. Once you’ve graduated and are on the street, then where you went to A Sport, Essay school is more important than the major. Here is how I would handle both situations: In these examples, I put the degree major first, because that is the the beholder, first thing a recruiter will care about. I also put my my recent (and most impressive!) degree first.

Notice I don’t put GPA. There are two reasons: 1) it clutters up the MMA: A Sport, Death Essay, page with less-important information, and beauty eye of the beholder, 2) unless you graduated with a 4.0, most people won’t think there is much difference between a 3.5 and MMA: Death, a 3.8. If your GPA is less than a 3.6, it probably doesn’t differentiate you from beauty is the eye of the beholder, others, so leave it off unless an employer requires it. Perpetual Scaffold? If your GPA is under 3.0, then I don’t have to explain why you would leave it off. Beauty Is The Eye Of The Beholder? If you graduated with honors, and it says so on Society, your transcript, then by all means mention it as in the first example.

If you college doesn’t award honors, do not make it up, even if your 3.9 GPA would have gotten you honors at a college that awards them. If you need to put a GPA in, then I would put it just to the right of the university name. What should I put if I have not graduated yet? This is one of my favorite resume techniques. The minute you start attending school you can put that you are working on a degree, and post your anticipated graduation date. The cool part is that you format it just like these examples, but word the graduation date a little differently like the “PhD degree” in the example, and put the the beholder, graduation date in of Appearance Essay, the future! No one is going to be fooled by this, so don’t worry about beauty eye of, looking like you are trying to get away with something, but what it does do is make your resume subtly look complete.

Plus it does answer the question about what you might be good at. What about other school accomplishments? Where should they go? Great question! If you were the Forum:, valedictorian, ASB president, or president of a club, then I would list up to three (but probably not more) bullet points underneath the senior project or thesis (if you mentioned one) or university name (if you didn’t). These should be quantified accomplishments in the form I describe in the next section. If you have more than two or three years of work experience in the field you are applying for, then your experience is beauty more important to rome 2 iceni guide a potential employer than your education, so once you' are no longer a new college grad, your education goes at eye of the beholder, the bottom of your resume and this section goes right under the objective. Why? Because it will be of most interest to the reader and you want it read during those first precious 20 seconds. Now there are lots of Discrimination of Appearance different ideas floating around about how you should format this section; the is the the beholder, most common is to put the date on the left.

The fact is that the MMA: A Sport, Not a Death, date is the least important piece of information relating you your employment history. Far more important is what you did, and beauty the beholder, then for whom you did it. When you did it is last. Lesotho Tourist? The order that I recommend you present the facts about each job is: Job Title Company Name Employment duration One sentence job description Two - Four Quantified Accomplishments. Most of the resumes I have seen (and written early in my career) were based on an old formula of describing the beauty eye of the beholder, job in terms of the formal job description. Forum: Of Early Roman Society Essay? The problem with this approach that it doesn’t differentiate the writer from everyone else applying for the job. Can you imagine how hard it would be to pick someone to interview for a bookkeeping job if every experienced bookkeeper that applied only listed their job duties? Every resume would say almost the exact same thing ! To avoid this problem, and to really make you shine, we write the beauty is the eye of, work experience section so that we focus on quantified accomplishments . This example shows my recommended format, and includes three quantified accomplishment statements. An accomplishment is troy the movie “quantified” when you describe it in terms of some quantity.

I like to try to get two numbers in each accomplishment if possible. Numbers make your claims more credible, and if you have some kind of big numbers, it can really make a good impression. Beauty Is The Eye Of The Beholder? Don’t over sell; let the troy the movie, numbers speak for you. If you can describe an accomplishment in beauty the beholder, a single line, that is fantastic. The Hub Of Early Roman? In fact, leaving some information out simply begs the reader to beauty is the the beholder want to know more. If you get invited for an interview, you can bet you’ll be asked about these accomplishments, and how can you go wrong talking about Trajan’s Forum: of Early Roman Essay, something you did that was great?

Don’t forget to mention awards and recognitions like Employee of the month three times” or “Top Producer in 2008”. Notice also that I have my job title in bold and in a larger font. I do that so that it is easier for beauty eye of the beholder, the reader to visually scan. Notice also that the company name is in Discrimination on Basis of Appearance, italics. Beauty Is The? That helps set the different facts apart. I have each fact separated by more than a couple of spaces so that each stands out. Now a bit more about rome 2 iceni, job titles.

Sometime you might have an the beholder, “official” job title that is so vague, or even wrong based on lesotho tourist, what you do. For example, I had three lateral job changes at eye of, an aerospace company that did not change my payroll classification, so my managers never bothered to Roman Society Essay updated my “requisition” to reflect the changes in my job title. So if you were to call the HR department and ask what my job title was, they would use the title I was hired at, not the one from the is the the beholder, last job I held! So on my resume, you can bet I use the title from the last job I was assigned to, not my “official” job title. The moral of the story is that if your “real” job title is too vague, or even deceptive, do not be afraid to put a more accurate, clear job title on rome guide, the resume . Example: if you had an internship in beauty eye of, a finance department, and your “official” title was “Intern”, do not be afraid to rome 2 iceni use “Intern-Finance Department”. I try to avoid this section if possible. It’s much better to beauty talk about the tools and lesotho tourist, skills you know in your accomplishments statements. But if you learned how to is the do something in Trajan’s The Hub Society, class, but haven’t used it on the job, and the job you are applying for beauty is the eye of, wants candidates who have this skill, you need to use this section.

But be careful. Here are some recommendations: Do not list skills and Forum: The Hub of Early Roman, knowledge that almost everyone has. The Beholder? The most common offender here is that you know Microsoft Office. As a recent college graduate, we assume you learned the basic programs. Stating it here does not differentiate you.

Avoid huge long lists using every acronym you can think of MMA: A Sport, Not a Death Match ie:, C#, C++, PHP, etc. Remember you are targeting each resume for beauty is the the beholder, a particular job, so only list the things a potential employer cares about. Huge list casts doubt on which of those you really know. When I see a big list I seriously doubt that the author really has working knowledge of all those technologies and his/her credibility really starts to slip. Troy The Movie? Be accurate in describing your knowledge. At Microsoft, if someone says he/she knows something, 9 times out of 10 we’ll make them prove it in an interview. Beauty? If you say you know C++, you can bet you’ll be ask to write a bubble sort or something like that in troy the movie, C++ on a white board during an interview. If its been 5 years since that Java class and you’ve not written a single line of code since then, don’t say you know Java.

Remember, your resume is just supposed to get you invited for an interview, not get you a job offer. Beauty? That is what the interview is for. Keep your resume simple and focused on a single job. Keep it to a single page. Troy The Movie? Catch-all, general-purpose resumes DO NOT WORK.

You can send out hundreds of these and you will never get a single response (I know – I tried it when I was young and inexperienced). On the other hand, you can send out ten, customized, targeted resumes using the approach outlined here and may get three, five, or even eight responses. Is The Eye Of The Beholder? This technique works if you have actually have sometime to offer an employer. Discrimination On Basis? Your resume is a personal statement of who you are from a particular point of view. You’ll get all kinds of advice about is the the beholder, how to do your resume, but you don’t have to do exactly as everyone tells you.

If you feel like you know better, then go with your gut feeling. Lastly, check out the additional (and more detailed) examples and Discrimination, guidance at the links at the top. There really is some good information there that I’ve gleaned from beauty, years of coaching students and others to get high-tech jobs in a competitive job market. And finally, PROOF READ everything many, many times, and have others look at your resume as well. (career center people are invaluable for Trajan’s Forum: The Hub Roman Society Essay, this). The Beholder? Good luck and good job hunting! [Note: an Discrimination on Basis of Appearance, earlier version of this post mysterious lost most of its content, hence this repost] I dont think the one page resume works in the IT industry if you are experience.

I tried that once after reading an article like this and was summarily eviscerated by beauty a recruiter for ruining my resume. The few times Ive been on scaffold, the market, my three page resume (4 with references) easily landed me interviews. Of course, I put the vital information on the front page in a summary section. Working with a recruiter is a different situation. The recruiter wanted every fact he could get his hands on. He was then going to be the beauty, hiring companys filter.

He would look at a job, and then market those parts of your resume that was a good fit. Had you attempted to get an interview with those companies yourself with your long resume, there is a chance they would have quit reading it before they got to the parts they cared about. It is certain that the parts they cared about could have fit on lesotho tourist, a single page, and is the, that is the goal. The trick of course is trying to guess from the job listing what a company will consider to be your relevant experience. My son-in-law recently completed a job search, and lesotho tourist, I helped with his resume. His recruiter commented that my son-in-laws [one page] resume was the first he had ever seen that he didnt feel like it needed fixing. So while I think there are situation where the use of a longer resume is is the eye of the beholder justified (like college professor jobs), I still believe that an individual applying for jobs is well served by perpetual a customized, targeted single-page resume. I am a graduate in the Manufacture Engineering field from two colleges and the same degree. Beauty Is The The Beholder? One is a 2yr and the other is a 4yr. The problem I am having is that there is never an opening for Entry Level Positions. All the jobs that are available and have gotten in the past are ones that are looking for 2 iceni guide, a candidate with 5-10 years of experience.

Since I really only beauty the beholder have 2 years, my resume is about 3-4 pages long in guide, hopes that I can sell myself for the 8 years I do not have. Plus about 95% of the is the eye of the beholder, time I get calls for possible jobs through recruiters. (Since this is how Industrial jobs are filled) Other jobs that I have on troy the movie, my resume are car mechanic places that show I am mechanical incline and can be more than an office employee. The Beholder? Every person that has read my resume does not believe that I should eliminate any mechanical experiences that I have. What should I do in this case, and should both colleges remain on the resume?? Do you have any full resume examples?

I was also wondering if you had any resume templates available for troy the movie, entry-level jobs. I am trying to get either an beauty eye of the beholder, internship of lesotho tourist entry-level part-time job in the marketing field. One of the things you havent addressed with experienced workers is how to beauty is the the beholder handle contract work (which Microsoft apparently believes in for project work.) I know you dont handle experienced workers so I am probably barking up the wrong tree. In any event, the way I see it, as a contractor I work for myself and subcontract my services. Lesotho Tourist? Initially I would list every project I worked on (that sometimes last a week), but realized that this isnt the way you do it if you work as a full-time consultant. So, now I just list the highlights of eye of these projects under my consulting job. Of course recruiters get mad since they want to The Hub Society Essay see every one listed out. I now looked at your video and is the eye of the beholder, its all clear.

I still plan to troy the movie keep to is the eye of the beholder 1 page. Hi Randy. this blog is pretty impressive, liked it! I have a question to you. I'm willing to apply for a microsoft full time position in their software development and lesotho tourist, i'm confused whether to submit a one page resume or a multi page one after reading your blog. Can you give me your suggestions? If applying for a Microsoft marketing internship would it be better to use their CV or would it be more appealing to upload a multimedia resume such as a power point presentation or create a website marketing myself? To be honest, our recruiters only is the have so much time to give to any one resume (like 20 seconds), and one of the tests of fitness is if a candidate can highlight their strengths concisely on a single page. I have seen some great resumes that struggled to fill half a page because every word was gold. Troy The Movie? In my opinion, a PowerPoint presentation or web page misses the point. One of my favorite examples is that you don't catch a fish by is the eye of the beholder throwing your entire tackle box in the river, you catch a fish by troy the movie knowing what one fly or lure to use out of all the stuff in beauty is the eye of the beholder, your tackle box.

Highlight the stuff you have done demonstrates your passion for software development by what you did outside of MMA: Match class or work assignments. Highlight your leadership (active or passive). Highlight the differentiators that relate to eye of the beholder the job you area applying for. Put the things that Microsoft will care the most about early in 2 iceni guide, your resume rather than later. Use as few a words as possible.

Don't make long lists of computer programs you have used a few times hoping that the key word search will select you. Beauty Is The The Beholder? We're smarter than that. Highlight awards and lesotho tourist, recognition you have received. Eye Of The Beholder? One of the hottest differentiators right now are apps. MMA: A Sport, Match? We'll talk to anyone that has published apps in the Windows Store or Windows Phone Marketplace, or iOS or Android stores, particularly if you've had a bunch of downloads or made some real money from them. That kind of is the eye of third-party evidence is very compelling to Microsoft recruiters. I would like to know what you feel the best way to put open source contributions on your resume is.

I can't decide whether I should write it in detail similar to a job, or as a bullet point in Trajan’s The Hub Essay, a personal projects section. @Karan, Great question. You are definitely thinking about this in the right way. My feeling is is the the beholder that you can go either way, depending on the scope of the contribution. Perpetual? Job History for a big contribution, personal project for a smaller contribution.

Using the job history approach, I would use the eye of, title Contributer or something similar, and the company as the open source application and the date from the first contribution to the most recent. Then the bullets would be either feature names and number of lines of code, or if it is a major feature, then the bullets would detail your contribution ie: lines of Trajan’s Society Essay code, rating or other quality measure, number of users of the feature, etc. Hello mam. I went through your article. I am presently pursuing my B.Tech in Computer Science And Engineering . What do I need to do to get a Job at eye of, Microsoft?It will be a pleasure to have a live chat with you mam/ @Subham Soni: Start at A Sport, Essay, and then select the is the, Student or Recent Grad link. Then read about the various jobs and how to apply for troy the movie, them. Good luck! I like the is the eye of the beholder, one page idea and want to convert to it. The problem is, I want to change industries (out of mortgages into tech, data, SAS sales) but I have had 9 different positions in the last 13 years, due to Trajan’s Roman Society Essay company closures, career advancement into management, and banking legislative changes. I know it is critical that I list how my skill-set and accomplishments will translate to the new industry/position, but how do I handle not having the room to list all of my positions without leaving gaps and raising suspicion that I am leaving something out? I'm not sure how to check back on this post, so if you could be so kind to forward your response to me at, I would greatly appreciate it.

This article was very well written and beauty is the the beholder, you are clearly an expert so I look forward to any suggestions or advice you can offer. @Joe Saylor This is a case where a cover letter may be necessary to assure the hiring organization that you are not a job-hopper by of Appearance Essay explaining the reasons. The goal for you is to show thoughtful career trajectory where each step reflects personal growth. What I would experiment is to think of yourself (for purposes of approaching your resume design) as a consultant with multiple clients over certain period of time. So you cluster by role since I would expect you did more or less the is the the beholder, same thing for a couple of rome 2 iceni different companies.

I might even omit the company name in the first line, and beauty is the eye of the beholder, mention multiple companies in Trajan’s Forum: of Early Roman, the description section. Again, I've never done a resume in exactly this way, but hopefully my sort of thinking out loud will show you how to approach this. It might be simpler to is the the beholder just go with two pages and to limit your earlier jobs to one or two lines. A two-page resume isn't all that bad. It is definitely better than doing something overly weird or awkward. When we are applying for Forum: The Hub Roman Essay, interships of beauty companies like microsoft or google,being a second year student of IT what should our resume should contain? Hello, Thank you for on Basis of Appearance Essay, taking the the beholder, time to write this article, it has been a great help to on Basis of Appearance Essay me as I'm restructuring my resume. When where should I add references? Randy, I have a bunch of personal projects which I work on and off, all close to beauty the beholder my heart, and I work on them because I really really love programming. That of course means some of them are not finished, but they are there. Rome 2 Iceni? Should I then include the beauty is the, github links to them?

Randy, should I include personal projects not academic on resume too? Impressive and on Basis Essay, useful post! Should resume include a scanned picture of the writer? and Should the writer include the beauty eye of the beholder, projects for which he's not having a certificate and are self made (made only in a hobby practice)? Thank you for your reply. @Umar: My advice about personal projects is to perpetual scaffold start a business, even if not formally or officially, but list your personal projects as an eye of the beholder, employee of your own company. Avoid a pretentious title like CEO or President and use something like Founder and Lead Developer. @ChristNolan: I wouldn't include a picture unless you are applying for a position as a model or acting talent; in that case your agency can advise. As I advised @Umar above, assume you work for lesotho tourist, your own company, and beauty is the eye of the beholder, list a non-pretentious title and showcase projects (not all of them) as appropriate for rome guide, the position you are applying for.

Make sure though that you quantify your accomplishments ie: lines of beauty code, special features, downloads and ratings (if an app), etc. @Sean: don't add references unless you are specifically asked, and most companies are moving away from Trajan’s The Hub of Early Society Essay, them due to privacy laws and the fact that you aren't going to provide references unless they are good anyway. I just re-read this post now six year later, and eye of the beholder, I agree with almost all of it except that now I think a longer resume is more acceptable ie: if you need two pages go ahead and spill over onto another page but do try to keep it as short as possible and don't use the extra page as an excuse to troy the movie put every fact about beauty, yourself that you can possibly think of. Only go onto a second page if you have gold to put on it. Rome 2 Iceni Guide? And get an outside opinion to confirm what you think is gold really is. How do I get a Microsoft Word 2013 Resume Builder or Template.

Hi Randy, Thank you for your advices, A friend recommended a video you had, but it is no available. Do you know where can I find the video? I really appreciate your thought process and having it explained properly, thank you! The best and most eye catching resumes let you stand out from the crowd. Likewise, I'd love to is the the beholder see those videos that aren't presently working! I'm presently in the process of applying for a job for Microsoft and I'm quite fresh from of Appearance Essay, school. This article more than any other so far has been useful, and I'm quite eager to is the eye of the beholder see those links. Thanks for your time! I really found the detail with which you have explained resume making very useful. I am currently a junior without any work experience and looking to apply for a good summer internship where I get a good learning scope in the fields of Discrimination on Basis of Appearance Essay Programming and algorithms.

As a person with no prior industry experience what do you think my resume should mostly focus on? @Joe Saylor: I think when you have a complicated situation, you either group your experience and list companies and time frames, or list the companies and beauty the beholder, just go with a longer resume. The secret here is to handle the Not a Match Essay, explanation in beauty is the the beholder, a cover letter. If you are submitting online, and they don't have a place for a cover letter, then just make the first page of your resume your cover letter and lesotho tourist, then follow with your resume below. BTW, the resume workshop video links are fixed. The video hoster I used went out of business so I had to beauty is the eye of the beholder migrate. Cheers, and good luck! Randy. @Ismael, @Ryno, @Sneha: Thanks for the heads up! I moved the videos to another hosting site and updated the A Sport, Essay, links.

You should be good to go! Randy. I also have a new blog post on beauty is the eye of, how to perpetual add student projects to your resume: Cheers! Randy. Randy, should we include any academic publications (conference papers for eye of, example) in Essay, the resume? Yes, if the publications directly relate to beauty eye of the job you are applying to. Lesotho Tourist? Publications should absolutely be included in eye of the beholder, a curriculum vitae (a special kind of resume for professors and researchers), or for rome guide, any job where publication will be part of the job.

If you are applying for a job in industry where your skills are what they are looking for, I would leave out the publications. Randy.

Write My Paper -
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - Wiktionary

Nov 09, 2017 Beauty is the eye of the beholder, write my paper -

Why You Should Never Say: Beauty Lies in the Eye of the Beholder

american flag essay Presented here are a some essays that I have assembled for all of beauty is the eye of the beholder, you with a patriotic heart. If you have a favorite essay that you would like to MMA: A Sport, Death Essay, contribute to beauty is the eye of the beholder, this collection please feel free to troy the movie, do so ! Be sure to include the title author (if known) to is the the beholder, Contact Us. If one asks me the troy the movie, meaning of beauty is the eye of, our flag, I say to him: It means just what Concord and Lexington meant, what Bunker Hill meant. Discrimination. It means the whole glorious Revolutionary War. It means all that the Declaration of Independence meant. It means all that the Constitution of our people, organizing for justice, for liberty and for happiness, meant. Under this banner rode Washington and his armies. Before it Burgoyne laid down his arms. Beauty Is The The Beholder. It waved on the highlands at West Point. When Arnold would have surrendered these valuable fortresses and precious legacies, his night was turned into day and his treachery was driven away by beams of light from A Sport, Not a, this starry banner. It cheered our army, driven out from around New York, and in their painful pilgrimages through New Jersey.

This banner streamed in light over the soldiers' heads at Valley Forge and at Morristown. It crossed the waters rolling with ice at Trenton, and is the when its stars gleamed in rome 2 iceni the morning with a victory, a new day of hope dawned on the despondency of is the eye of, this nation. Our Flag carries American ideas, American history and American feelings. Beginning with the Colonies, and rome guide coming down to our time, in its sacred heraldry, in its glorious insignia, it has gathered and stored chiefly this supreme idea: divine right of liberty in man . Every color means liberty; every thread means liberty; every form of star and beam or stripe of eye of, light means liberty - not lawlessness, but organized, institutional liberty - liberty through law, and laws for liberty! This American Flag was the lesotho tourist, safeguard of liberty. Not an atom of crown was allowed to go into is the, its insignia. MMA:. Not a symbol of authority in the ruler was permitted to go into it. It was an ordinance of is the, liberty by the people, for the people. Guide. That it meant, that it means, and, by the blessing of is the the beholder, God, that it shall mean to the end of of Appearance Essay, time! Our Flag - America's Tonic Against Cynicism. [ Note : From the Nov.-Dec.

1994 National Flag Foundations Standard Bearer Magazine. This article remains the copyrighted material of the National Flag Foundation and beauty eye of is presented here by permission.] As Vice President and as a Senator and member of Congress before that, I have visited dozens of foreign countries. Believe me when I say I have seen lots of flags. Death. Every country in the world flies flags on ceremonial occasions, such as the is the, arrival of dignitaries on official trips. But something sets Americans apart. We don't just put out the flag for A Sport, Essay, important visitors, or on solemn occasions, and then put it away.

Ordinary Americans, by eye of the beholder the millions, revere our flag and display it every day. We fly it from tall poles in front of our businesses, from short poles in our front yards, from balcony railings in our condominium complexes. We pin the flag on our jacket lapels and paste it to the windows of our cars and trucks. Perpetual. As soon as our toddlers can hold a little stick in their tiny fists, we give them Old Glory to wave at the Fourth of July parade. And at life's end, we drape the caskets of our fallen patriots with the eye of the beholder, Stars and Stripes. This proud display of, and devotion to, the symbol of our nation is uniquely American.

It is troy the movie, how we reaffirm the fact that we are indeed one nation and that whatever our other differences, there are core values Americans hold in common: a belief in the dignity of the individual, a love of liberty, and a commitment to is the, government of, for, and by the people. By displaying the flag, we express our gratitude to the generations past who fought and died for this country, and we remind ourselves of rome 2 iceni, our obligation to preserve for generations to come the freedom that others won for us. One of the priviledges enjoyed by those of us in public life is to be greeted by flags most everywhere we go. This simple expression of is the eye of, patriotism is often a welcome relief from the cynicism of elites in our nation's capital who are too sophisticated to be caught waving a flag. My aquaintances in the major media might find this hard to believe, but there's nothing like seeing proud faces of youngsters reciting the of Appearance Essay, Pledge of Allegiance to remind you of the high ideals that first led you to seek elected office. I realize that the temper of our times is increasingly cynical, that Americans in growing numbers raise a skeptical eyebrow upon hearing the words high ideals and elected office in the same breath. If you read the same newspaper stores I do, then you have seen the public opinion polls showing in what low repute we now hold the major branches of government.

I must admit there are days when I understand those feelings. Is The Eye Of The Beholder. It's easy to look at the discrepancy between what officials say and what they do, and to become cynical as a result. However, I don't believe Americans will ever become entirely cynical -- as long as they keep flying the flag. As a symbol of our republic and its institutions, our link to this country's past and to its future, the flag helps us keep in mind that the Founding Fathers created a durable and admirable system of government. Perpetual Scaffold. The founders didn't pretend to guarantee that only honorable men and women would hold office. In fact, they assumed the opposite is the, -- and scaffold created a system of checks and balances as insurance against the imperfect politicians they knew would always exist. In other parts of the world, people tend to find Americans' love of the flag overly sentimental.

I believe that our system of government, for all its occasional flaws, is still the finest in the world. Far from being sentimental, we have very good reason to show our appreciation anew every day. This country was not built by men who relied on somebody else to take care of them. It was built by men who relied on themselves, who dared to shape their own lives, who had enough courage to blaze new trails with enough confidence in themselves to beauty is the the beholder, take the necessary risks. This self-reliance is our American legacy. It is the secret of perpetual, that something which stamped Americans as Americans. Some call it individual initiative, others backbone. But whatever it is called, it is is the eye of, a precious ingredient in our national character, one which we must not lose. The time has come for us to re-establish the rights for which we stand, to re-assert our inalienable rights to perpetual scaffold, human dignity, self-respect, self-relianceto be again the kind of people who once made America great. Such a crusade for renewed independence will require a succession of inspired leaders, leaders in spirit and in knowledge of the problem, not just men with political power, but men who are militantly for the distinctive way of life that was America. We are likely to find such leaders only beauty is the the beholder among those that promote self-reliance and who practice it with strict devotion and understanding.

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the troy the movie, same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for the beholder, ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the of Early, debate.

It is only in is the eye of this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the Trajan’s Forum: The Hub of Early Society Essay, great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of beauty is the eye of, giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings. Lesotho Tourist. Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. Is The Eye Of. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to on Basis, be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to is the the beholder, provide for it. I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of perpetual scaffold, no way of beauty, judging of the future but by the past.

And judging by the past, I wish to Trajan’s of Early Society, know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for beauty eye of, the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and perpetual reconciliation?

Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to is the eye of, be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. Troy The Movie. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the is the the beholder, last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to perpetual, force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and beauty rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging.

And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to of Appearance Essay, offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain.

Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope.

If we wish to be free -- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for the beholder, which we have been so long contending -- if we mean not basely to on Basis of Appearance, abandon the beauty eye of the beholder, noble struggle in scaffold which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to beauty is the eye of the beholder, abandon until the troy the movie, glorious object of beauty, our contest shall be obtained -- we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us! They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to The Hub of Early Society Essay, cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the is the eye of, next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength but irresolution and inaction?

Shall we acquire the troy the movie, means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of is the eye of the beholder, people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in lesotho tourist such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to beauty eye of the beholder, retire from the contest. On Basis Essay. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged!

Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable -- and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come. It is in beauty eye of the beholder vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace -- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun!

The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to guide, our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in beauty is the eye of the beholder the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to troy the movie, be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!

I know not what course others may take but as for me; give me liberty or give me death. On the night of Good Friday, 1865, he left us to join a blessed procession, in neither doubt nor fear, but his soul does indeed go marching on. For this was the Bible-reading lad come out of wilderness, following a prairie star, filled with wonder at beauty, the world and its Maker, who all his life, boy and man, not only knew the Twenty-third Psalm but, more importantly, knew the Shepherd. Now it seems possible that we shall never see his like again. This is a sobering thought, but it should be a kindling one, for upon us now, as a people and a party, has been laid perhaps the greatest responsibility any nation was ever asked to shoulder, yet certainly not greater than we can bear. Our days are no longer than were Lincoln's, our nights are no darker, and if there is any difference between his time and this it lies in on Basis of Appearance Essay the tremendous advantage that is ours, that he stood so tall before us. In such a time and at such a moment we surely can say then, from hopeful, brimful hearts: We are standing, Father Abraham, devoted millions strong, firm in the faith that was yours and is ours, secure in the conviction bequeathed by beauty eye of the beholder you to us that right does make might and that if we but dare to do our duty as we understand it, we shall not only survive. --we shall prevail. What's a flag? What's the love of country for which it stands?

Maybe it begins with love of the land itself. It is the fog rolling in with the tide at Eastport, or through the Golden Gate and among the lesotho tourist, towers of San Francisco. It is the sun coming up behind the White Mountains, over the Green, throwing a shining glory on Lake Champlain and above the Adirondacks. It is the storied Mississippi rolling swift and muddy past St. Louis, rolling past Cairo, pouring down past the levees of New Orleans. It is lazy noontide in beauty the beholder the pines of Carolina, it is a sea of wheat rippling in Western Kansas, it is the San Francisco peaks far north across the glowing nakedness of Arizona, it is the Grand Canyon and a little stream coming down out of a New England ridge, in which are trout. It is men at work.

It is the storm-tossed fishermen coming into guide, Gloucester and Provincetown and Astoria. It is the farmer riding his great machine in the dust of harvest, the dairyman going to the barn before sunrise, the lineman mending the broken wire, the miner drilling for the blast. It is the servants of fire in the murky splendor of Pittsburgh, between the Allegheny and the Monongahela, the eye of the beholder, trucks rumbling through the night, the locomotive engineer bringing the rome, train in on time, the beauty is the, pilot in the clouds, the riveter running along the beam a hundred feet in the air. It is the clerk in the office, the housewife doing the dishes and sending the children off to school. It is the teacher, doctor and parson tending and helping, body and soul, for Not a Match Essay, small reward.

It is beauty eye of, small things remembered, the little corners of the scaffold, land, the houses, the people that each one loves. Beauty The Beholder. We love our country because there was a little tree on a hill, and grass thereon, and a sweet valley below; because the hurdy-gurdy man came along on a sunny morning in a city street; because a beach or a farm or a lane or a house that might not seem much to others were once, for each of us, made magic. Of Appearance Essay. It is voices that are remembered only, no longer heard. It is parents, friends, the lazy chat of street and store and eye of the beholder office, and the ease of mind that makes life tranquil. It is Summer and Winter, rain and sun and storms. These are flesh of our flesh, bone of lesotho tourist, our bone, blood of beauty eye of the beholder, our blood, a lasting part of lesotho tourist, what we are, each of beauty is the, us and all of us together. It is stories told. It is the Pilgrims dying in their first dreadful Winter. Trajan’s Forum: Of Early Roman Society. It is the minute man standing his ground at Concord Bridge, and dying there. It is the eye of the beholder, army in rags, sick, freezing, starving at Valley Forge. It is the wagons and the men on foot going westward over Cumberland Gap, floating down the great rivers, rolling over the great plains.

It is the settler hacking fiercely at the primeval forest on his new, his own lands. It is Thoreau at perpetual, Walden Pond, Lincoln at eye of, Cooper Union, and Lee riding home from Appomattox. It is corruption and perpetual scaffold disgrace, answered always by men who would not let the flag lie in the dust, who have stood up in every generation to fight for the old ideals and the old rights, at risk of ruin or of life itself. It is is the eye of, a great multitude of troy the movie, people on is the eye of the beholder, pilgrimage, common and ordinary people, charged with the usual human failings, yet filled with such a hope as never caught the imaginations and the hearts of any nation on earth before. The hope of liberty. Match. The hope of justice. The hope of a land in which a man can stand straight, without fear, without rancor.

The land and the people and the flag, the land a continent, the eye of, people of troy the movie, every race, the flag a symbol of what humanity may aspire to when the wars are over and the barriers are down: to beauty is the eye of the beholder, these each generation must be dedicated and consecrated anew, to troy the movie, defend with life itself, if need be, but, above all, in friendliness, in hope, in courage, to live for. I am an American: That's the way we put it, simply, without any swagger, without any brag, in those four plain words. We speak them softly, just to ourselves. We roll them on the tongue, touching every syllable, getting the feel of them, the beauty eye of, enduring flavor. We speak them humbly, thankfully, reverently: I am an American. They are more than words, really. They are the sum of the lives of a vast multitude of men and women and A Sport, Not a Match wide-eyed children. They are a manifesto to mankind; speak those four words anywhere in the world -- yes, anywhere -- and those who hear will recognize their meaning. They are a pledge.

A pledge that stems from a document which says: When in the course of human events, and goes on from there. A pledge to those who dreamed that dream before it was set to paper, to beauty, those who have lived it since, and died for it. Lesotho Tourist. Those words are a covenant with a great host of plain Americans, Americans who put their share of meaning into them. Listen, and you can hear the voices echoing through them, words that sprang white-hot from bloody lips, scornful lips, lips a tremble with human pity: Don't give up the ship! Fight her till she dies. Damn the torpedoes! Go ahead! . . . Do you want to live forever? . . . Is The The Beholder. Don't cheer, boys; the poor devils are dying. Laughing words, June-warm words, words cold as January ice: Root, hog, or die. .. I've come from Alabama with my banjo. . 2 Iceni. . Pike's Peak or bust! . . . Busted, by God! . . . Is The Eye Of. When you say that, smile. Wait till you see the whites of their eyes. MMA: Match Essay. With malice toward none, with charity for beauty is the eye of, all, with firmness in the right. A Sport, Not A Essay. I am not a Virginian, but an American.

You can hear men in assembly summoned, there in eye of Philadelphia, hear the scratch of perpetual scaffold, their quills as they wrote words for the hour and produced a document for the ages. You can hear them demanding guarantees for which they suffered through the hell of war, hear a Yankee voice intoning the is the, text of ten brief amendments. MMA: Match Essay. You can hear the slow cadences of a gaunt and weary man at is the eye of the beholder, Gettysburg, dedicating not a cemetery, but a nation. You can hear those echoes as you walk along the streets, hear them in lesotho tourist the rumble of traffic; you can hear them as you stand at the lathe, in the roaring factory; hear them in the clack of beauty eye of the beholder, train wheels, in the drumming throb of the air liner; hear them in the corn fields and in the big woods and in the mine pits and the oil fields. But they aren't words any longer; they're a way of life, a pattern of living. They're the rome, dawn that brings another day in which to get on the job. Beauty Is The The Beholder. They're the noon whistle, with a chance to get the kinks out of your back, to get a bowl of soup, a plate of lesotho tourist, beans, a cup of coffee into eye of, your belly. They're evening, with another day's work done; supper with the wife and kids; a movie, or the radio, or the newspaper or a magazine -- and no Gestapo snooping at the door and threatening to MMA: A Sport, Death Match, kick your teeth in. They are a pattern of life as lived by a free people, freedom that has its roots in rights and obligations: The right to go to a church with a cross or a star or a dome or a steeple, or not to go to any church at all; and is the eye of the obligation to respect others in that same right.

The right to harangue on a street corner, to hire a hall and shout your opinions till your tonsils are worn to a frazzle; and the obligation to curb your tongue now and then. The right to go to school, to learn a trade, to enter a profession, to troy the movie, earn an honest living; and the obligation to do an honest day's work. The right to put your side of the argument in the hands of a jury; and the obligation to abide by the laws that you and your delegates have written in the statute books. The right to choose who shall run our government for us, the right to a secret vote that counts just as much as the next fellow's in the final tally; and eye of the obligation to use that right, and guard it and keep it clean. The right to hope, to dream, to rome guide, pray; the obligation to beauty is the, serve.

These are some of the meanings of those four words, meanings we don't often stop to perpetual scaffold, tally up or even list. Only in the stillness of a moonless night, or in the quiet of a Sunday afternoon, or in the thin dawn of a new day, when our world is is the, close about troy the movie, us, do they rise up in our memories and stir in our sentient hearts. Only then? That is not wholly so -- not today! For today we are drilling holes and driving rivets, shaping barrels and loading shells, fitting wings and is the the beholder welding hulls, And we are remembering Wake Island, and Bataan, and Corregidor, and Hong Kong and Singapore and Batavia; We are remembering Warsaw and Rotterdam and scaffold Rouen and Coventry. Remembering, and muttering with each rivet driven home: There's another one for eye of, remembrance! They're plain words, those four. Simple words. You could write them on your thumbnail, if you chose, Or you could sweep them all across the scaffold, sky, horizon to horizon.

You could grave them on stone, you could carve them on the mountain ranges. You could sing them, to the tune of Yankee Doodle. But you needn't. You needn't do any of is the eye of, those things, For those words are graven in perpetual scaffold the hearts of 130,000,00 people, they are familiar to is the eye of the beholder, 130,000,000 tongues, every sound and every syllable. But when we speak them we speak them softly, proudly, gratefully: I am an lesotho tourist, American. Is The Eye Of. We do honor to the stars and stripes as the emblem of our country and the symbol of all that our patriotism means. We identify the flag with almost everything we hold dear on earth. It represents our peace and security, our civil and political liberty, our freedom of religious worship, our family, our friends, our home. We see it in the great multitude of lesotho tourist, blessings, of rights and privileges that make up our country. But when we look at our flag and behold it emblazoned with all our rights, we must remember that it is equally a symbol of our duties.

Every glory that we associate with it is the is the, result of A Sport,, duty done. A yearly contemplation of our flag strengthens and purifies the national conscience. In response to a request from England for a description of Col. George Washington, his aide-de-camp, John Francis Mercer, wrote: He may be described as being as straight as an Indian, measuring six feet two inches in his stockings and weighing 175 pounds when he took his seat in the House of Burgesses in 1759. His frame is padded with well developed muscles, indicating great strength. His bones and beauty joints are large, as are his feet and A Sport, Not a Death hands. He is beauty the beholder, wide shouldered, but has not a deep or round chest; is neat waisted, but is lesotho tourist, broad across the hips, and has rather long legs and arms.

His head is well shaped though not large, but is gracefully poised on a superb neck. Eye Of The Beholder. A large and straight rather than a prominent nose; blue-gray eyes which are widely separated and Trajan’s Forum: Society overhung by eye of a heavy brow. His face is long rather than broad, with high round cheek bones, and terminates in a good firm chin. He has a clear though rather colorless pale skin, which burns with the troy the movie, sun. Beauty Is The Eye Of The Beholder. A pleasing, benevolent, though a commanding countenance, dark brown hair, which he wears in a cue. His mouth is large and Discrimination Essay generally firmly closed, but which from beauty the beholder, time to time discloscs some defective teeth. His features are regular and on Basis placid, though fiexible and expressivc of deep feeling when moved by beauty is the the beholder emotion. What strange doubts assail this timid generation of today as it beholds the challenges to both liberty and equality. We seem beset with fear not faith, with doubt not confidence, with compromise not conviction, with dismay not dedication.

We are drenched with the Essay, literature of fear and beauty eye of the beholder doubt. Survival has become the main theme. MMA: Not A Match Essay. The fall-out shelter from which the stars of hope and courage cannot be seen has become the symbol of our fears and eye of misgivings. Are we to become fearful, unworthy legatees in a blessed, united land where the earth is fertile to our every need, where the skills and ingenuity of men are boundless, where the burdens are bearable, where decent living is troy the movie, within the reach of all, and where the genius to produce is unlimited? Perhaps we have lost our sense of continuity? Perhaps we have forgotten that we move in that same endless stream which began with our forefathers and beauty eye of which will flow on and on to embrace our children and our children's children. If we have, there will have gone with it that sense of individual responsibility which is the last best hope that a nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to equality can long endure.

Comes then the reminder from the man from Illinois. Men died here and men are sleeping here who fought under a July sun that the nation might endure, united, free, tolerant, and devoted to equality. The task was unfinished. It is never quite finished. I was born an lesotho tourist, American; I live an American; I shall die an American; and I intend to perform the eye of the beholder, duties incumbent upon perpetual me in that character to the end of my career. I mean to do this with absolute disregard of personal consequences. What are the personal consequences? What is the individual man, with all the good or evil that may betide him, in comparison with the good or evil which may befall a great country, and in the midst of great transactions which concern that country's fate? Let the consequences be what they will, I am careless.

No man can suffer too much, and no man can fall too soon, if he suffer, or if he fall, in the defense of the liberties and eye of constitution of Discrimination Essay, his country. Daniel Webster Speaks at is the eye of, Bunker Hill. The first time I ever saw Mr. Webster was on the 17th of June, 1825, at the laying of the on Basis of Appearance Essay, corner-stone of the Bunker Hill Monument. I shall never forget his appearance as he strode across the open area, encircled by some fifty thousand personsmen and women, waiting for the Orator of the beauty, Day, nor the shout that simultaneously burst forth, as he was recognized, carrying up to the skies the name of Discrimination on Basis Essay, Webster! Webster! Webster! It was one of those lovely days in June, when the sun is bright, the beauty is the eye of, air clear, and the breath of nature so sweet and pure as to fill every bosom with a grateful joy in Trajan’s The Hub Essay the mere consciousness of existence. There were present long files of soldiers in their holiday attire; there were many associations, with their mottoed banners; there were lodges and grand lodges, in white aprons and blue scarfs; there were miles of citizens from the towns and the country round about; there were two hundred gray-haired men, remnants of the days of the Revolution.

Mr. Webster was in the very zenith of his fame and of his powers. There was a grandeur in his form, an intelligence in his deep dark eye, a loftiness in his expansive brow, a significance in his arched lip, altogether beyond those of any other human being I ever saw. And these, on the occasion to which I allude, had their full expression and interpretation. When he came to address the few scarred and time-worn veterans, some forty in number, who had shared in eye of the beholder the bloody scene which all had now gathered to commemorate, he paused a moment, and, as he uttered the perpetual scaffold, words Venerable men, his voice trembled, and I could see a cloud pass over the sea of faces that turned upon the speaker. He said: Our poor work may perish, but thine shall endure: this monument may moulder away, the solid ground it rests upon may sink down to the level of the sea; but thy memory shall not fail. Wherever among men a heart shall be found that beats to beauty is the eye of the beholder, the transports of patriotism and liberty, its aspirations shall claim kindred with thy spirit!

I have never seen such an effect, from a single passage. Lifted as by inspiration, every breast seemed now to expand, every gaze to turn above, every face to beam with a holy yet exulting enthusiasm. It was the omnipotence of eloquence, which, like the agitated sea, carries a host upon The Hub of Early Essay its waves, sinking and swelling with its irresistible undulations.

Write My Essay : 100% Original Content -
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - Idioms by The Free Dictionary

Nov 09, 2017 Beauty is the eye of the beholder, buy essay papers online -

Images for beauty is the eye of the beholder

faculty resume fraud University of Toronto Fraud. SEE ALSO MY NEW SITE: Concealment of Fraud in Science. revealing the secrets of scientific establishment. This fraud should put an end to beauty is the the beholder NSERC. In 1981 I began PhD research at troy the movie, the University of Toronto. I walked into beauty is the eye of the beholder, a trap: after five years, I was removed from the Trajan’s Forum: The Hub of Early Roman Essay University and the credit for my work and my discoveries was stolen by the professor-supervisor and three other people. I received no degree. In my research on the development of beauty is the eye of the beholder, organs in the Drosophila fruit fly, I have discovered that what previously was thought to be unorganised mass of embryonic cells (called imaginal discs in larvae), in 2 iceni guide, fact possesses peculiar cell arrangements specific for future organs.

I have also discovered that a mutation that causes embryonic tissue normally producing one organ (antenna) to produce a different organ (a leg), is actually changing the pattern of cell arrangement in is the eye of, the embryonic tissue. This pattern, therefore, represents the material basis of embryogenesis at the cellular level. Rome! It appears that the positional information for the structure of future organs is encoded in the cell arrangements of embryonic tissue. As my PhD supervisor, Ellen Larsen knew that my research had a very high scientific value, but she wanted to steal it. With this purpose, she fraudulently made an academic decision preventing me from writing the thesis, declaring me a lapsed student and removing me from the University.

She said that my work was not good enough for my PhD thesis. As soon as I left, she fraudulently used her knowledge of my work to steal it. She published three papers presenting my research as her own and, this time, boasting of the beholder, its high scientific value. Incredibly, when at perpetual, one point she was caught and had to withdraw one of the papers from publication, she still published it later. Yet, the University and beauty is the the beholder the Canadian Government refused to see the facts. Perpetual Scaffold! To save this professor from jail and to save her falsified academic credit for scientific discoveries Canada closed all doors for the beholder, me. In the lesotho tourist next 28 years I had no job, my family was destroyed by beauty eye of the beholder the disastrous circumstances. Perpetual! Beginning from my first complaint to the Department of Zoology in beauty the beholder, 1987, higher and higher officials were corrupted: from the Department to the Government and the law enforcement. Official answers to my complaints were given to me in one sentence. The University of Toronto had soon crossed the line separating a university from an organized crime.

All professors of the Department were silenced. Campus press was ordered to keep silence. Lesotho Tourist! The governmental officials were lying to is the the beholder me openly, completely unconcerned about Trajan’s The Hub of Early Essay, consequences. Unable to change the facts in the documents, but determined to save Larsen from jail, the university and the Government had falsified, perverted and abolished the law. The fraud is continuing. I discovered the is the eye of the beholder three Larsen's plagiarised papers in 1993 and complained to the university. The Department said that there was no evidence of plagiarism.

I went to the court and obtained a number of university documents showing astonishing corruption. I also sent my complaints to the Committee on A Sport, Not a Death Essay, Professional and beauty is the eye of Scientific Integrity of the Natural Sciences and perpetual scaffold Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) which, however, sent them back to the university for investigation. The university, contrary to the rules, did not appoint an investigative committee that should have included competent scientists. The university appointed the is the eye of the beholder vice-Dean, D. Perpetual! Dewees, a lawyer, as a sole investigator. He wrote a report that left out the direct proof of plagiarism and fraud that was clearly present throughout the articles and all other documents. He also falsified the academic law several times, for instance: despite admitting that Larsen published my research as her own, he denied her plagiarism. He then declared that Larsen had salvaged my research. In the academic decision written by beauty Larsen, the rome guide reason for terminating my PhD program was that I will not have financial support to continue my research. She also said that I can be reinstated (when his theoretical models have fully matured), but if so, how could she start salvaging my research when I left?

Obviously, her academic decision and beauty the perspective of my reinstatement were a complete fraud. Perpetual Scaffold! Her goal was leaving me outside of the university as an unsuccessful student and stealing my research. Despite my repeated protests, the NSERC Committee accepted the university investigation conducted illegally, without an expert committee, by a single investigator. NSERC sent me this answer to my complaints: The Committee agrees with the is the eye of conclusions of the investigative report that there was no breach of scientific integrity by Dr. Larsen. The Committee considered that Dr. Larsen behaved in a reasonable manner given your refusal to have the 1987 article published. This answer related to the fact that in 1987, a year after I left, Larsen, without my knowledge, sent to Trajan’s Forum: The Hub Essay the journal a paper with my two discoveries, under my and her names and, when it was accepted for publication, she phoned me and beauty is the eye of asked me to sign it. I refused to troy the movie sign it and is the eye of the beholder called her a thief, but she continued to on Basis Essay insist that I should sign it. I complained to the Department, raising also the beauty eye of question of my removal from the lesotho tourist university.

The Department only told me that Larsen has withdrawn the paper. Beauty The Beholder! Larsen wrote a letter to troy the movie the editor withdrawing the paper; she admitted that the paper was all my work, my discoveries and experiments, but she lied about the reasons for terminating my PhD program and did not give the beauty eye of the beholder editor the true reason for withdrawing the paper, she said: he.. Perpetual Scaffold! decided for reasons of his own that he does not want his work published . She said that she will submit the results of a similar study (performed by myself and an undergraduate) in the very near future . In 1989, she published a paper with my research and discoveries under her own name and is the the name of the student. Later, she wrote an insane explanation to the Department, saying that I forfeited a publication for naught . Did I not have a right to refuse signing the 1987 paper? Of course, I had. Can my refusal to sign this paper serve as a justification for Larsen and her student subsequent publishing a forgery - the same my experiments and discoveries published under their own names? Of course, not. Troy The Movie! The NSERC Committee presented Larsen's behavior as a result of beauty, my own fault. NSERC answer was a concealment of Forum: The Hub of Early Roman Essay, fraud and falsification of beauty is the the beholder, academic law. My next letter to NSERC requesting the lesotho tourist Committee report was not answered.

Furthermore, the NSERC had fraudulently ignored the fact that Larsen sent for publication two other papers plagiarising my research before I refused to sign this third, 1987 paper. At the time when I was asked to sign it, I had no idea about the other two papers, and beauty is the Larsen told me nothing. This phenomenal crook started stealing my research when she removed me from the university, not when I refused to sign 1987 paper. She needed my signature on Trajan’s Forum: The Hub of Early Roman Society Essay, the 1987 paper to claim that she was a co-author of my discoveries. In fact, she was not. Before Larsen terminated my program, she published a review article where she included my research, with my permission, as personal communication.

When I refused to sign the beauty 1987 paper with her co-authorship, neither Larsen nor the Department made any argument or explained why she needed this paper. Continuing stealing my research, Laren could not tell the editor the lesotho tourist true reason for my refusal to the beholder publish the paper, but in her explanation to the Department she said that I forfeited a publication for naught; the editor probably wouldn't agree with such attack on my right of authorship. To the editor she said that she will send a new paper , but in her explanation to the Department she dropped that lie and said that I had no right to suppress the use of ideas , virtually admitting that she stole my ideas as well. She needed to scaffold take away all my rights, otherwise she could not defend herself. And she gave another argument: The results of the second paper corroborate the first.. I can see no justification for calling this plagiarism. . So, why this prostitute of beauty is the the beholder, science did not say this in her new paper? All her defenses were a blatant falsification and mockery of the law; they could not deceive anyone. But, she did not expect a punishment from the friendly criminals in the university administration or from the Not a Death friendly criminal gang in the NSERC. In 2012, NSERC established the Panel on Responsible Conduct of Research with its Secretariat having the duty of reviewing institutional investigation reports to ensure the process followed by the institution is in accordance with its own responsible conduct of beauty is the, research policy (this policy included appointment of the investigative committee with competent scientists). I sent to Discrimination on Basis Essay the Panel the list of 20 breaches of this policy in the university investigation. The Secretariat missed reviewing institutional investigation report and blatantly lied that these my allegations were already addressed by NSERC in the 1996 and 2003 letters; in fact, these short letters did not answer or address even one of my allegations against the university investigation.

Secretariat further lied that my list of allegations is an appeal of the previous NSERC decisions; in fact, NSERC never made any decisions on my allegations against university investigation. (See this latest fraud and beauty is the the beholder the letters here.) Secretariat declared my case closed; I did not receive any answer from the Panel. There can be no doubt that Secretariat lied about NSERC letters to sabotage the investigation of my legitimate complaints. The Secretariat is a group (females only) of troy the movie, leftist crooks with Susan Zimmerman as the Executive Director. Zimmerman is also the Executive Director of three other Secretariats in other areas of science, so, writing practically all decisions on research integrity in Canada. Their business in science is a politically motivated deceit, corruption of beauty the beholder, science, and nothing else. The pattern of criminal manipulations is exceedingly clear: my complaints of plagiarism and fraud were never allowed to of Early Roman be investigated and answered by a scientist; my case travelled from one corrupt official to another, all - supporting the eye of the beholder fraud and, no doubt in my mind, all - bribed. In 2011, I wrote a letter describing the disastrous situation in science and proposing to allow an independent jury of scientists to participate in the investigations of scaffold, fraud in universities (see it here). Indeed, Canada is known for the unusual secrecy and dishonesty of its academic procedures, and the creation of an independent investigative body was advocated by many others. The Government, however, created the monstrous Zimmerman's Secretariats, certainly knowing that their decisions will reflect the corrupt political attitudes and not a honest scientific opinion. The NSERC Secretariat tells me that its decision is final.

Since 1986 I live under terror; my rights, my good science and my good name are denied and destroyed. The criminals who run the administration of science in Canada continue to beauty is the the beholder pretend that no proof of Larsen's fraud or plagiarism does exist. Below is the full story with over 50 documents. The fraud perpetrated on me by the university together with the Roman Society Government was a hideous savagery and practically a fascist destruction of science. Here, are short quotations from the documents describing my work, written by Larsen and the Department at different times: The theoretical published work shows extreme originality.., ..he has been invited to international conferences to discuss this work.., ..outlined an entirely novel approach.., This combination of technical and theoretical skill is rare., ..a tireless worker.., ..capacity to read and think and synthesize information for weeks at a time., His selection of problems and approach to them show a clarity of thinking and beauty an appreciation for elegant work which make his contributions original., ..inquisitive mind.., .. great technical skill and perseverance.., ..his contributions.. Trajan’s Forum: Of Early Essay! will continue to be above ordinary., His devotion to ideas and the sacrifices he has made.. make it clear that he is a scholar by is the the beholder nature.., We estimate he is of first-class calibre.. our Departmental Graduate Committee ranked him 1st of 7 applicants [for the NSERC scholarship] . He has already proven himself as an troy the movie, independent researcher.., He has hypothesized that each disc should have specific cell arrangements which are prepatterns of the adult structures.. Mr. Pyshnov's demonstrated creativity in conceiving of this novel approach plus his superb technical skills uniquely qualify him to carry out these studies of beauty eye of the beholder, far reaching significance., ..a man of rome 2 iceni, proven scholarly attainments.., ..a very creative scientist.. (Quotations are from the Documents 2, 3, 4 and 19.) The reader may wonder how the Larsen's fraud and beauty is the eye of the blatant provocation of her victim can continue for 29 years.

The answer is rome 2 iceni guide that in Canada, the law is routinely prostituted to protect certain criminals; that is the case here. The mass media refused to hear me, and this was an ominous sign. I have no doubt that media silence was arranged before the officials boldly started lying. Is The! The protected criminals can also kill me. I have little choice, but I will not stop talking and will not stop fighting for justice. Yet, when the stupid friends of Larsen did not remove her and continued her fraud, they did not expect that my published research can make it difficult to wipe out my name.

That's how the matter stands today, May 21, 2015. After the events in Forum: of Early Roman Essay, the University of Toronto I was able to publish one theoretical work showing the beauty eye of the beholder principal mechanism of cell proliferation in MMA: Not a Match Essay, tissues ( ), thanks to the computer program developed by a colleague. The program gives animated computer simulation of cell divisions in a tissue. It is based on a concept regarding living tissues as crystals and the cells as the elements of the lattice. Is The! It is well known that cells in lesotho tourist, a tissue are connected with each other and beauty is the cannot move independently. I previously showed that in an adult proliferating tissue, cell divisions should proceed in division waves and Trajan’s Forum: of Early Roman Essay not independently. In this way even a fast proliferating tissue can maintain its size and its structure unchanged, in a steady state. My PhD research was an application of this model to the developing embryonic tissue. On June 28, 2011, a new article published in the ArXiv: Structure and Growth in the Living Tissue and in Carbon Nanotubes (M. Is The The Beholder! Pyshnov and S. Fedorov) . It appeared that my 1980 topological model of cell proliferation in the intestinal crypt (J. theor.

Biology) exactly corresponds to the structure of rome 2 iceni, carbon nanotubes! The same mechanism of growth that I proposed for the beholder, the intestinal crypt in troy the movie, 1980, was proposed as the mechanism of growth of the carbon nanotubes and fullerenes twelve years later. Now, it took more than six months to beauty is the eye of read about the 2 iceni guide nanotubes. The new article contains further suggestions for beauty is the, the mechanisms of lesotho tourist, growth in the nanotubes, and beauty eye of some insight into troy the movie, the class of structures governed by eye of the topological laws operating in a two-dimensional lattice, the class of Discrimination on Basis of Appearance Essay, structures to which the crypt and the nanotubes both belong. Recently, I published an interesting paper in another area - plant biology, in the BioRxiv, I was looking for a method of obtaining secondary roots from the seeds of Vicia faba with a view to study chromosome structure, and I found that primary and secondary roots have clearly different requirements for growth: primary roots need moist air and at the beginning will not grow in water, but secondary roots need water and beauty is the will not grow in perpetual scaffold, air. Most strangely, I could not find any mentioning of these obviously central facts of the roots growth in is the, the literature. It appears that roots were cultivated mostly on the substrates that contained both water and air and it was difficult to distinguish their different needs. In the end I found an interesting paper published two months earlier, titled: Plant roots use a patterning mechanism to position lateral root branches toward available water. The Hub Of Early! However, my hypothesis is that air prevents the formation of lateral roots and they can develop when the air is removed, and the immersion in water does exactly this. The authorship of beauty is the eye of, my research was falsified before I could publish the research in MMA: A Sport, Death Match, my PhD thesis. My credentials were damaged and my prospects for a position in academia disappeared.

I cannot speak, in any journal, about my ideas, research and beauty the beholder discoveries. To return my research under my name, I need the official retraction of the plagiarised papers. In fact, the procedure for A Sport, Not a Death, such retraction does exist. I became aware of it after the massive cleansing of scientific journals and the retraction of published papers containing falsified and plagiarised research began a year ago. On March 27, 2008, I made a request for the retraction of one obviously plagiarised paper. Beauty The Beholder! So far, however, the process is going nowhere. The story of the plagiarised paper. Having removed me from the university, Larsen figured out that it would be good for 2 iceni guide, her to publish one paper under my name and her name, and, so, to have a proof that I agreed that she was a co-author of my discoveries. Beauty Is The The Beholder! She, secretly from me, wrote and submitted to the Transactions of the A Sport, Not a American Microscopical Society a short and inferior article, boldly claiming the two main discoveries made by me during the five years of my PhD program.

When this manuscript was accepted for publication , she asked me to sign it. I, of course, refused, called her a thief and wrote a letter of protest to beauty is the eye of the Department. Larsen had to withdraw the manuscript. Then, failing to obtain my consent to her co-authorship, but firmly believing in her impunity in the circle of friends in the corrupt Canadian academia, Larsen decided to send to the same journal a new paper claiming the same discoveries as her own. Scaffold! Incomprehensible as it is, the journal did publish it. Below, are the titles, authors, abstracts and footnotes of the 1987 withdrawn manuscript and the paper published in 1989, side by side for comparison: Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Cananda.

Department of is the, Zoology, University of A Sport, Not a Death Essay, Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada. September 16, 1987. Dr. Eugene H. Schmitz, Editor Transactions of the American Microscopical Society Department of Zoology University of Arkansas Fayettville, Arkansas 72701 USA. I am writing with reference to MS 483-87. I regret that owing to circumstances I shall outline below, I must withdraw this manuscript from consideration. I intend, however, to submit the results of a similar study (performed by myself and an undergraduate) in the very near future, one which because of its somewhat wider scope may actually be a more satisfying contribution. The first author of MS 483-87, Mr. M. Pyshnov was a graduate student under my supervision for some five years. Is The Eye Of! In my opinion he is a very creative scientist with great technical flair. Unfortunately, after discovering disc specific cell arrangements and their modification in a homeotic mutant he became unable to do more research.

A year after he produced his last preparations (those found in the MS) his graduate student status was changed to lapsed student, ie, one who is free to return to complete requirements but who is no longer officially registered. I was hoping that publication of his work would encourage him and enable him to resume his progress towards a degree. Unfortunately he has changed his mind and decided for reasons of perpetual scaffold, his own that he does not want his work published. I am not only disappointed with his decision but embarrassed to have to retract the work after so many other people have given it their expert time and effort. In the new paper I shall try to incorporate both the reviewers' and your excellent stylistic suggestions so that these efforts will not have been entirely wasted. Other documents also confirm my authorship of the ideas, research and is the discoveries in the 1987 manuscript (and, therefore, in the 1989 paper). Lesotho Tourist! It has been admitted by Larsen and the University of the beholder, Toronto that the theoretical foundation of my research was published by Not a Match Essay me in 1980 (Journal of beauty the beholder, Theoretical Biology), before I came to this university ( Statement of Defense , paragraph 22). Soon after I began my PhD program, Larsen wrote that I reviewed an extensive Drosophila literature, outlined an entirely novel approach to Discrimination looking at morphogenesis in imaginal discs. Two years later, she said : He has hypothesized that each disc should have specific cell arrangements which are prepatterns of the adult structures and: Pyshnov's demonstrated creativity in conceiving of this novel approach plus his superb technical skills uniquely qualify him to carry out these studies of the beholder, far reaching significance. In fact, I predicted the scaffold results of my experiments. Beauty The Beholder! The discoveries were unique and no similar ideas had been published, which also makes it easy to see that the 1989 paper is my PhD research plagiarised.

At the scaffold time when Larsen was asking me to sign the 1987 MS, she was in the process of publishing (without my name and without my knowledge) two other papers stealing my research and ideas (published in 1987 and 1988 ) . In these two papers, she lied that this research was published under my and her names previously, and, she gave a reference to a non-existing publication. In the eye of the beholder 1989 paper, she removed the reference to A Sport, Death Match Essay my 1980 paper that was in the withdrawn manuscript and that she later admitted to be the theoretical foundation of my research. The 1987 manuscript used my term whorls for the specific structures discovered by me, but in is the the beholder, the 1989 paper Larsen never used it, she substituted it with the term clusters. However, her friends in UC at Essay, Berkeley where she spent a sabbatical year, published, nine years later, a paper where they say that Larsen and beauty is the the beholder Zorn discovered whorls! Clearly, Larsen earlier presented to them this discovery with my term whorls, and Forum: The Hub of Early Essay her later changing of the beauty is the eye of the beholder term was a fraud. In the 1989 paper Larsen claimed, as her own, hundreds of my experiments done in the course of the lesotho tourist last six years. She claimed, as her own, the ideas that she never had and the discoveries that she never made. And, she lied repeatedly about the reason for terminating of my PhD program - compare the above letter to the Editor with her fraudulent academic decision and with her later explanation where she also presents her own concept of intellectual property and says: Perhaps Michael feels betrayed because he forfeited a publication for naught. In this last explanation she does not repeat her lie that I became unable to do more research and she omits to say that my graduate student status was changed to lapsed student. She is lying that I left because I had no money to continue my PhD program (in fact, I had the money and had never taken a student loan).

E. Larsen is a liar and thief. Beauty Eye Of The Beholder! It is an inescapable conclusion that such type could not have enjoyed impunity for so long without bribes. It is rome guide interesting to note here that E. Larsen had published one paper , a review, in which she did not plagiarise my research. She published it when I was still working in the laboratory, and beauty is the with my consent. In this paper she is describing my theory and my discoveries (those that she stole after I was removed from the scaffold university) as personal communications from me. Beauty The Beholder! It is even more interesting that among the 145 works cited in this review (including one my paper), there is not a single one of her own. The review was written to somehow insert her name into the literature on the subject. She missed the important points in my research after years of my explanations, but freely transferred my ideas in guide, her pathological activity in scientific circles (see her letter to me ); her own best ideas are in beauty eye of, paradigm shifting. My request to retract the plagiarised paper. The fraud now is spreading.

1. The journal is silent for seven months. While the proof of on Basis of Appearance, plagiarism is complete, the Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Patrick D. Reynolds, whose duty is to retract this paper, is not doing this. The publisher of the beauty is the eye of journal, John Wiley Sons (now, Wiley-Blackwell) is the second largest publisher of scientific journals. Its policy and its efforts (together with 12 other publishers) in finding published plagiarised papers worldwide are well known. Wiley-Blackwell has declared that it is the duty of journal editors to Trajan’s Forum: The Hub of Early Society investigate suspected cases of misconduct. Beauty Is The! Wiley-Blackwell has adopted A code of conduct for perpetual scaffold, editors of biomedical journals of the Committee on Publication Ethics. The code tells the editors to maintain the integrity of the scientific record and always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies when needed. Editors must follow the investigative procedure: Flowcharts , 4b, Suspected plagiarism in a published article. Beauty Eye Of! Yet, none of this due process has been accomplished since I requested the retraction on troy the movie, March 27, 2008.

Dr. Reynolds initially informed me that he will conduct some sort of consultation with other editors of the beauty journal at the next conference call. He then changed this and said that it can take place only at the Annual Meeting of The American Microscopical Society in January of 2009. He stopped answering my emails in July of 2008. Then, I contacted John Wiley, wondering about the gross delay in the retraction procedure. The Wiley Editor never answered my question repeated several times, about the timeline for the retraction procedure, but, I was assured that Patrick Reynolds is taking your concern seriously and will be responding to you directly and that He is striving to Discrimination on Basis Essay respond to you presently. She, then, abruptly ended the correspondence. I sent another message to Dr. Reynolds, and it was ignored again.

I don't know if Dr. Beauty! Reynolds will continue as Editor-in-Chief after the January meeting. It is possible also that Ellen Larsen will flee the scene of the rome 2 iceni crime. Something very wrong is beauty is the eye of obviously going on. Nothing, however, can abolish the duty of the journal and the duty of the publisher to troy the movie retract the paper in question. 2. The Editor answers my request, but not really. November 24, 2008. The paper is beauty the beholder not retracted, and the reason is - University of Toronto does not want the retraction: Given that the charge of plagiarism in this article against Dr. Larsen has been dismissed by three investigations of the employer, the University of Toronto, and again by the Canadian federal funding agency NSERC, and in the absence of any new substantive information in the nearly two decades since publication in troy the movie, TAMS, the journal has no grounds to retract the article, nor to consider its removal or withdrawal.

Despite your evident dissatisfaction with those investigations, neither the beauty journal nor its co-publishers have standing to challenge their legitimacy. Well, I wrote another letter: You explain your decision not to Discrimination on Basis retract the 1989 Larsen and Zorn article thus: Given that the charge of beauty, plagiarism in this article against rome 2 iceni Dr. Larsen has been dismissed by beauty is the eye of three investigations of the employer, the University of Toronto, and again by rome 2 iceni guide the Canadian federal funding agency NSERC, and in is the, the absence of any new substantive information in the nearly two decades since publication in TAMS, the journal has no grounds to perpetual retract the is the article, nor to consider its removal or withdrawal.

Despite your evident dissatisfaction with those investigations, neither the 2 iceni guide journal nor its co-publishers have standing to challenge their legitimacy. (Please, notice that the is the the beholder repeated references in your letter to removal and withdrawal of an article are excessive as I never asked for the removal or withdrawal of the paper, but only for the retraction.) I submit to Discrimination of Appearance you the is the following: 1. You should have presented your own findings of facts with references to evidence and the applications of law. The procedure required you, in the first step, to compare the articles in Trajan’s The Hub Roman, question for plagiarism. But you do not report your findings. Beauty Is The Eye Of! Instead, you made an assumption that the local Canadian investigations denying plagiarism are legitimate, and you never mentioned a single point of evidence that could constitute the grounds for perpetual scaffold, your decision. Beauty Is The The Beholder! This was completely wrong.

Your decision should not have been based on lesotho tourist, the supposed legitimacy of Canadian local investigations. 2. According to beauty is the the beholder the procedure (Flowchart 4b of the COPE) you should have sent me the response of E. Larsen, so that I could make my comments, but you did not do this. I request that you do so now. 3. Your statement that you have no standing to challenge their [local investigations] legitimacy is Discrimination on Basis of Appearance Essay completely erroneous. It is a well known fact that local investigations can cover up misconduct in beauty eye of the beholder, research, and, in this case they have no legitimacy. They cannot be blindly accepted. A journal's conclusions can potentially be totally different from the conclusions of the of Early Society Essay local investigators, but you made this legitimate possible outcome to appear illegitimate, forbidden and impossible, as you refused to challenge the legitimacy of Canadian investigations. While you could consult local investigations, you could not pronounce them legitimate a priori, otherwise, you make your own procedure and beauty is the the due process impossible.

Of course you have an obligation to conduct your own independent investigation of the documentary evidence in the case. And, if your findings contradict the Trajan’s Forum: The Hub of Early Roman Society Essay local investigations, but you refuse to challenge them, you can find yourself doing greater harm - even perpetuating a local fraud. You are rrequired by the procedure to send your own findings to the local employer and the funding agency. Did you send them their own investigations instead? 4. Blindly accepting the results of Canadian investigations of eye of, misconduct was wrong: a) The special report of Prof. Arthurs on the case of troy the movie, Prof. V. Fabrikant (, stated that two university investigations were misleading, superficial, not based on a proper inquiry, clearly and seriously deficient and inadequate. b) Recently, Canadian Medical Association Journal published the paper Call for arms-length national research integrity agency ( Beauty! It starts thus: It's the classic Canadian response to a problem like scientific misconduct, says Toronto physician scientist Dr. Paul Pencharz. Deny, deny, deny.

Sweep it under the carpet. c) Next, the lesotho tourist editorial titled Research misconduct? What misconduct?, in eye of, the same journal ( asked: Why has Canada lagged so far behind its Western counterparts in establishing comprehensive mechanisms and processes to deal with scientific misconduct?, and rome it said: Lets not wait for the next scandal. Deny, deny, deny is the classic Canadian response, not an beauty eye of, exception, and this is well known. The system of investigations in Canada is rome below the standards that you and your journal have to adhere to. 5. I must also bring to your attention the eye of the beholder fact that your impression that there were three investigations of the employer, the University of Toronto, and again by scaffold the Canadian federal funding agency NSERC is incorrect. The University of beauty is the eye of the beholder, Toronto President lied when he said that my complaint was fully investigated by Discrimination on Basis of Appearance the University and by NSERC (document #43).

As a matter of fact, NSERC did not investigate my complaint and does not investigate other complaints. NSERC sends the complaints back to the university. The CMAJ article, referred to in the paragraph 4c, said: Currently, the investigation of misconduct allegations is the domain of universities. Eye Of! and . the councils [NSERC and others] refer all complaints to perpetual the university that employs the alleged miscreant for investigation. Here you have a competent Canadian proof that the beauty is the eye of fact that NSERC is involved in the case, does not guarantee the correctness and legitimacy of the university investigation. On the contrary, there are grave doubts that a Canadian university becomes capable of conducting proper investigation by the involvement of MMA: A Sport, Not a Essay, NSERC. These grave doubts, the dissatisfaction with the flawed Canadian system of eye of, investigation of misconduct in science, and scaffold the failure of two university investigations, over many years, to stop the fraud in food science that became a concern around the beauty is the the beholder world, prompted An Examination of Research Integrity Issues. of 2007 (, that made recommendations to Not a Death Match bring the investigations to the accepted international standards. The changes, however, are still resisted. Therefore, your assumption about the legitimacy was wrong, and it became outrageously wrong when it resulted in your refusal to present your own findings relying on the evidence in the case. 6. You report that you thoroughly reviewed the beauty is the the beholder history of this issue (i. Trajan’s Forum: The Hub Roman! e. Beauty Is The Eye Of! my complaints to the local investigators and their answers). You know, therefore, that two University of Toronto investigations (documents #24 and #27) admitted the fact that E. Larsen repeated my original experiments and Roman published my original experiments and results as her own, and you know that they did not consider this publication a plagiarism. These investigators committed several other similar frauds and falsifications of the academic law.

You had no right to disregard all these obvious frauds in the investigations and make the beauty is the eye of decision that the journal has no grounds to retract the on Basis of Appearance article. 7. You did not challenge Canadian authorities and you did not challenge their fraud. As a result, your report does not have any analysis of the history of beauty is the eye of the beholder, this issue. Nowhere, do you explicitly support any particular point of the Canadian investigations either. Your report does not present any concrete relevant considerations, either your own or borrowed, on which your decision can rest. You do not present a single reference to troy the movie any documentary evidence that can support your decision. You had seven months to conduct your investigation, but your report is totally devoid of any reliance on facts, and, you wrote an untenable decision that is beauty is the eye of the beholder totally unsupported by evidence.

I am certain that you could not find a single piece of evidence supporting your decision. 8. While you are telling me that my request for MMA: A Sport, Not a Death Essay, retraction has been thoroughly reviewed, with the the beholder implication that my request was found invalid, you do not report any conclusions of your review and I have no opportunity to answer any. Lesotho Tourist! Adding this to your refusal to challenge the supposed legitimacy of Canadian investigations, I believe that your impartiality and your numerous assurances of your scrupulous fairness are seriously undermined. 9. You have noted (and it stands as a material part of your decision), the beauty eye of absence of any new substantive information in the nearly two decades since publication in TAMS. This is not correct. The document #25 presents the new substantive information - Larsen's admissions that she used my ideas and data.

There are new admissions of the facts that any honest investigator would call the facts of lesotho tourist, plagiarism (in documents #24 and #27; I spoke of them in paragraph 6). There is also a new and extremely important admission made jointly by E. Larsen and the University of Toronto (document #36), that the theoretical foundation of my research was published by me in 1980, i. e. before I came to this university. All the above information came after the publication in TAMS. 10. The 1989 paper of Larsen and Zorn was accepted for publication by the same journal that had, at the same time, the manuscript of 1987 with the same title and claiming the same discoveries, but with different authors. It was absolutely wrong to publish this paper in the first place. In this case, the beauty retraction should only require some simple honesty to admit the journal's mistake or whatever it was. Your journal was notified on March 27, 2008, and it cannot continue to support this plagiarised, fraudulent publication. Perpetual Scaffold! The information (the 1987 manuscript and is the the accompanying documents) that your journal was aware of at MMA: Death Match Essay, the time of publication, and that was put before you again, is absolutely sufficient grounds for retracting the beauty is the the beholder 1989 article immediately.

This publication, falsifying my authorship of the discoveries and very seriously damaging my credentials, with extremely serious consequences for my life, amounts to defamation, to say the least. I request an immediate retraction of this paper and troy the movie the publication of all reasons for beauty is the eye of, the retraction, explicitly restoring my rights as an author. Sincerely yours, Michael Pyshnov. (This letter was not answered. The emphasis in red in paragraph 10 is only here, not in my email. Three typos are corrected.) * * * How can a journal be prohibited to investigate plagiarism in one of its papers and forced to accept an obvious fraud? Normally, Dr.

Reynolds should have protested and perpetual scaffold resigned. Taking away the editorial independence and causing such indignity to the Editor, to the journal and to the scientific society publishing this journal is an act of unprecedented corrupt influence. The University of Toronto, however, did it before and did it many times. Beauty Eye Of! This criminal gang monopolised the Forum: The Hub of Early Roman Society Essay right to pronounce judgement on this paper. They prohibited every other office and every individual to look at this paper. Here are just some of the examples of how it was repeated again and again: When I asked 78 professors of the eye of Department for their expert opinion on this paper, the university lawyer sent each of them a letter making it impossible for them. Only one professor answered me and sent a letter protesting the treatment given to me, to the Head of the Department and the university President. Of Early Society! He, then, was intimidated by the Head of the Department. When I asked Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities to the beholder investigate the fraud committed by the University of rome 2 iceni guide, Toronto, they refused (were bribed?), saying that only the university can decide its own academic matters. When I went to the court, the university told the court that it has no jurisdiction over the academic matters.

The court agreed (was bribed?). (The decision was later overturned by beauty the Court of Appeal.) Scores of Not a Death, media reporters were prohibited to publish a single word about the plagiarism and beauty is the corruption at the University of Toronto. They range from the campus press to Eliot Marshal of the Science magazine. * * * In the hands of the Committee on Publication Ethics. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) received (on February 2, 2009) my complaint of editorial misconduct and fraud perpetrated by the Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Reynolds.

Last year, the rome Committee adopted 5000 scientific journals and eye of their respective Editors as members of COPE who must obey the Code of Conduct issued by COPE. In fact, the MMA: Not a Death Match Essay publishers of these journals established the same rules and procedures for their Editors (copying the COPE Code of Conduct and the COPE Flowcharts for each type of case) years before that. Last year, however, the Editors became formally answerable to COPE for their conduct. My correspondence with the Committee (and my comments on the particular points in this correspondence) is on the separate page. It shows that the beauty is the Committee did everything to protect Ellen Larsen and lesotho tourist her plagiarised paper, leaving the record of science in the journal permanently falsified. The first answer that I received was that my complaint of plagiarism is beauty is the not a complaint of troy the movie, plagiarism because I said that my UNPUBLISHED research was plagiarised. Beauty Eye Of! The Committee perverted the definition of troy the movie, plagiarism, excluding from it plagiarism of unpublished research.

They said that my complaint is an authorship dispute that only the University of Toronto knows how to resolve. In fact, of course, (see the documents above), there was no authorship dispute; on the contrary - Larsen many times admitted my authorship of the research, discoveries and ideas in question. She did a fraud - she withdrew the first manuscript but published the same research and beauty is the eye of the beholder discoveries saying that her paper is just a similar study. The corrupt Committee on Publication Ethics completely avoided any mentioning of the documents. Next, still insisting on their own interpretation of the definition of plagiarism, the Committee brought up another pretext for rejecting my complaint against the Editor: the Editor was not a member of COPE at troy the movie, the time when he received my case. The Committee, meanwhile, suggested that I continue pursuing my case with the Editor without the COPE involvement. Eye Of The Beholder! I replied that if I do this, the Editor, being now a member of COPE , must follow the Code of Conduct and COPE must monitor his present conduct. No way, said the Committee: Our view is that if you return to Dr Reynolds or Wiley-Blackwell you are doing no more than continuing a case that was first opened with them in March 2008. Is there anything wrong with my case against the plagiarist, forbidding the COPE to monitor the present and future conduct of the Editor in my case? The Committee never gave a clear explanation; they, obviously, did not want the Editor to follow the Code of Conduct in my case. They were embarrassed by their own suggestion for me to go again to the Editor.

The Committee was talking as a used car dealer relying on a completely infantile deception. Their last letter (though it admits: We probably did make a mistake with our interpretation of the term plagiarism. ), presents a completely comical nonsense; it is worth reading as an entertainment. How did this Committee become an advisor and a judge in matters of publication ethics in 5000 scientific journals, when not a single word of these people can be trusted? How they can be trusted to investigate drug testing, cancer treatment, falsification of scientific data and falsification of the authorship in Discrimination of Appearance Essay, scientific publications, when they are covering up the obvious fraud? How long it will take for someone to notice this corruption of science and to take action? In Canada: Saving Professor Larsen from jail. Falsifying, perverting and abolishing the law. Below is further evidence of fraud and criminal conspiracy perpetrated by the following: former President of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) T. Eye Of! Brzustowski , former Ontario Minister D. Cunningham , former Ont.

Attorney General J. Perpetual Scaffold! Flaherty , former University of Toronto President R. Birgeneau (presently - Chancellor of the UC at Berkeley), University of Toronto professors: I. Orchard , D. Dewees , B. Roots , S. Desser , P. Gooch , E. Larsen . The details of the fraud, references to articles and is the eye of the beholder the links to scanned documents are here: Ruthless Science Fraud at the University of Toronto. On this page are the main events, the present situation, the MMA: Not a Death Essay links to other pages of is the, this web site and insight into the social causes of the continuing fraud. Links to the parts of lesotho tourist, this page (it can also be scrolled continuously): My research is stolen. In 1986, after 5 years of very successful research my PhD program was terminated despite the official assurance that I had at is the the beholder, least one more year to finish the thesis. As soon as I left, my supervisor, Professor Ellen Larsen, began writing papers attributing my research, discoveries and ideas to herself. The first two papers.

The first paper published after my departure was entitled: The Morphogenetic Alphabet: Lessons for Simple-Minded Genes . MMA: Death Match Essay! The joy of beauty is the the beholder, having me out of the troy the movie way was so great that she and her co-author (H.M.G. McLaughlin) stealing my discoveries, were using words such as: We are now in a position to eye of the beholder make specific predictions.., We have presented a scenario.., we marshal evidence... What was my PhD research, the two thieves claimed as our preliminary data. They posed as the discoverers and also gave ..general conclusions about research strategies. In these two papers, to avoid accusations of stealing and of breaching confidentiality, Larsen was pretending that this research had already been published. She was giving a bogus reference to a non-existent publication. This publication, in fact, was my poster (with her name in the second place as a supervisor) that was displayed at a conference for two hours but never published anywhere. A more calculated fraud is difficult to imagine. Larsen's third paper was discussed above. It is worth reading the opinions of two professors (one, A. Hilliker, was the lesotho tourist President of The Canadian Genetics Society), (Doc.

30 and 33 ), considering plagiarism in this paper. When I found that all my research was stolen and complained to beauty is the the beholder the University, Larsen wrote an explanation (Doc. 25 ). She said: In the retracted work, wild-type discs were compared to troy the movie mutant discs, in is the eye of, the second paper, discs from two mutant strains were compared. She was blatantly lying: the titles, abstracts and texts of perpetual, both, the withdrawn manuscript and eye of the beholder her paper, compare wild-type and mutant strains. The withdrawn manuscript: Cell Patterns Associated with Normal and MMA: A Sport, Match Mutant Morphogenesis in Silver Stained Drosophila Imaginal Discs, Michael Pyshnov and Ellen Larsen.

Larsen's paper: Cell Patterns Associated with Normal and Mutant Morphogenesis in Silver-impregnated Imaginal Discs of Drosophila, Ellen Larsen and Aaron Zorn. So, how she compared two mutant strains? Her paper says that she used also a second mutant. But, she did not analyze its mutation! She says that she looked at its normal tissue which was exactly the same as in any normal fly. Therefore, there was no comparing of the the beholder two mutants. The second mutant was not even mentioned in the abstract. The paper is a deception, plagiarism and fraud. It does not show any tissue pattern other than those shown by me, and I can even doubt that she performed any experiments. She, then, offered justifications that practically admit the fact of plagiarism.

One justification was the same one that communists used while taking away private property: she said that my discoveries belong not to me, but to community and that therefore she was entitled to publish my research under her own name. She said that I can not suppress the use of ideas. Another was this: The results of the second paper corroborate the first. . But, the first is not published; for the readers her paper is the original research, not a corroborating data. She sadistically added: Perhaps Michael feels betrayed because he forfeited a publication for naught. The fraud of academic decision On October 18, 1985, I received a letter from the Associate Chairman of the Department (Doc. 6 ) saying that I had one more year to complete my thesis and scaffold that extensions are becoming increasingly difficult to obtain, unless there are extenuating circumstances and beauty is the the beholder evidence of substantial progress. This letter did not change any of my plans; I had enough time and, in any case, I had the evidence of a very substantial progress.

But, minutes after receiving her copy of perpetual, this letter, Larsen handed me her own letter, making the first step in a fraud intended to terminate my program much sooner and prevent me from writing the thesis. She wrote: Since I have serious doubts about your ability to complete your experiments and thesis requirements in the time remaining, I intend to convene a committee meeting in early January to review your situation and make appropriate recommendations. (Doc. 7 ) Then, in beauty eye of the beholder, January, she wrote the lesotho tourist academic decision (Doc. 8 ): The committee met on beauty is the the beholder, 24 January 1986 and found the work of the Trajan’s Forum: The Hub of Early Roman Society student may not be completed by the time his financial support terminates in April 1986. If this occurs he would allow his Ph.D. candidacy to lapse with the expectation of being reinstated when his theoretical models have fully matured. At the Graduate Committee meeting I was told that my research can not constitute a PhD thesis. When I said: Let me write the eye of thesis, I was told: Michael, you have no thesis.

I was also asked if I will need money to continue my research. I answered that if I will need money I can borrow it from the student burse (I did not need to perpetual scaffold do this before). The Committee, however, signed the text of the academic decision written by Larsen and presenting an is the the beholder, impossible and totally irrelevant declaration predicting that I might not complete my work because. I will not have money in my pocket when my scholarship ends in scaffold, April of eye of, 1986! And, it declared that for the above reason I, myself, would allow my candidacy to lapse. In April, I asked Larsen to convene another meeting (that, as I supposed, had to be held in April) to again consider my position. She flatly refused, saying: There is no need for the second meeting. You are out.

The Doc. 19 (Larsen's letter to the journal editor written upon my refusal to sign a paper with her name as an author) was quoted in full above. Perpetual! This letter confirms that my status was changed by is the eye of the academic decision, but there is troy the movie no connection in it with my scholarship money. Here she said that the reason for changing my status was that I became unable to beauty is the do more research. But, later, in Doc. 25 (her justifications) she does not say that my status was changed or that I became unable. ; she says: he was not forced out of the Ph.D. , He left the of Appearance Essay program amicably when his money ran out . The University investigator, I. Orchard, was unable to cite any legitimate cause or purpose for making this academic decision. He said in his report (Doc. 24 ) that the academic decision indicated that his 5 year term was up . He lied. It did not and could not indicate this.

What was my reaction to this decision? At the is the time, there was no any conflict situation. I could not understand why I was prevented from continuing my research, but I was sure that Larsen will apologize and lesotho tourist will call me back because I knew the value of my research. She knew this also: over is the the beholder, the five years, my research and my abilities were characterised by Larsen in the most laudable terms possible. (These are quoted below .) I simply could not take this academic decision in any other way but as an aberration. However, it was not proper to challenge the Committee's judgement of my work. I would not demand better marks. I woke up only when one year later I was called to sign a paper with Larsen's name as an author. MMA: Essay! Until this very moment Larsen pretended to be my best friend, and I had no idea that she already sent to eye of the journals two other papers stealing my research. The letter to the Editor shows Larsen's astonishing mendacity.

She did not inform the rome 2 iceni editor of the main relevant fact - that I protested her authorship of the manuscript. She also did not say that this manuscript was sent secretly from me. She lied: he has changed his mind and beauty the beholder decided for reasons of his own that he does not want his work published. Very interesting is the fact that in this manuscript she did not state the number of experiments done at all and on Basis it was all written in beauty is the eye of, a manner of lesotho tourist, a claim, without a proper scientific discussion. The goal of this manuscript was only to have her name as an author published with my name and with my consent just once, just to is the the beholder give the fraud some legitimacy. At this time she already plagiarized my discoveries and ideas in A Sport, Not a Death Essay, two other papers, and she also had published, before I left, a review paper boasting of the discoveries made by me in her laboratory, so, she could always say that the first author of one of her papers was her unsuccessful student. When my consent was denied, she published her similar study that included even the stylistic suggestions made for the withdrawn manuscript, but only a person who read her letter to the editor or the beauty is the eye of the beholder withdrawn manuscript knows that the troy the movie paper is a fraud. She, therefore, made four papers out of the is the eye of the beholder research which she herself could hardly even understand. Clearly, I was not an unsuccessful student. And, obviously, Larsen is a criminal plagiarist and falsificator.

She terminated my PhD program to steal my research. What she had done in the capacity of perpetual scaffold, my supervisor should be studied as an encyclopedia of fraud in is the, university. Below is a part of Doc. 34 (an Appeal from the Graduate Students' Union to troy the movie the members of the faculty with the request to speak out): The University fraud. There were two University of Toronto own investigations from which it is obvious that in her similar study Larsen stole my research. The first investigator (I. Orchard, Doc. 24 containing two pages; I was not aware of this investigation till two years later) stated that she repeated my experiments. Second investigator (D.

Dewees, Doc. Beauty! 27 containing four pages; It was the only official investigation ever done) stated that her paper had replications or extensions of my results and that she did not acknowledge this fact. Therefore, she reported as her original results something that was discovered by another person, isn't it so? But, the investigators were not bothered with the criterion of Trajan’s Forum: The Hub of Early Roman Essay, originality, they falsified rules and beauty is the definitions that are universally recognized for centuries, and denied any plagiarism. I doubt that Larsen even repeated my experiments. But, whatever she repeated or replicated, she knew the results and she published a forgery to fit these results and falsified the lesotho tourist authorship of my research, i.e. Beauty Eye Of The Beholder! committed plagiarism.

This point I could not prove to the officials in the University or elsewhere: this country is waging a war against me. Moreover, the University administration continued the fraud in still another direction: a theory was invented that Larsen salvaged my research when I refused to publish the manuscript! But, Larsen started stealing my research before I refused to publish this manuscript! However, the investigators did not investigate her first two papers for plagiarism. The evidence related to of Early Essay the third paper (that Larsen's salvaging included falsification of authorship, that she removed any reference to my research, made bogus reference to a non-existent publication and beauty is the wrote a fake acknowledgment) was suppressed.

Her admissions in Doc. Troy The Movie! 19 and 25 were never considered. Her ridiculous justifications in Doc. 25 were never questioned. The truthfulness of Larsen's statements was never questioned! My academic record falsified. Falsification of the authorship of my research is of course a falsification of my academic record. But, the University of Toronto falsified my academic record even further. Nobody has ever heard of salvaging a research, and any such bizarre claim would at least need admission that this research has a scientific value. But, if the beauty is the the beholder University of Toronto had confirmed this scientific value, firing me and then salvaging my research would betray a fraud. So, the University insisted on the paucity of my research and denied any value to it as a research for my PhD thesis.

They accused me of laziness, which would hardly be possible to say if the hundreds of experiments that Larsen claimed to have conducted in the course of the last six years were returned under my name. How barbarous was the fraud can be seen from the following. This is from my Open Letter to Not a Match Essay The President of The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Mr. Rabinovitch: U of T says now that I did almost nothing in five years. If so, why would anybody desire to salvage my research? Below are the abbreviated quotations from previous recommendations (all available in full text, as well as other documents): The theoretical published work shows extreme originality.., ..he has been invited to international conferences to discuss this work.., ..outlined an entirely novel approach.., This combination of technical and theoretical skill is rare., ..a tireless worker.., ..capacity to read and think and synthesize information for eye of the beholder, weeks at a time., His selection of problems and approach to them show a clarity of thinking and Discrimination Essay an appreciation for elegant work which make his contributions original., ..inquisitive mind.., .. great technical skill and perseverance.., ..his contributions.. Beauty Is The! will continue to be above ordinary., His devotion to ideas and the sacrifices he has made.. make it clear that he is a scholar by nature.., We estimate he is of first-class calibre.. our Departmental Graduate Committee ranked him 1st of 7 applicants for 2 iceni guide, [ the highest scholarship in beauty eye of the beholder, Canada ] awards.

He has already proven himself as an independent researcher.., Mr. Pyshnov's demonstrated creativity in conceiving of rome, this novel approach plus his superb technical skills uniquely qualify him to carry out these studies of far reaching significance., ..a man of proven scholarly attainments.., ..a very creative scientist.. ( Quotations are from the Documents 2 , 3 , 4 and 19 ) In 1980, a year before I came to the University of Toronto, I published a study of the beauty is the eye of patterns of scaffold, cell division in an organism (J. Theor. Biol., v.87, p.189-200; scanned here ). I postulated and beauty the beholder described a division wave in a tissue and showed that the division wave is the only way how the Discrimination cells can divide and multiply without destroying the structure of the tissue. This article has given a new foundation for the research in stem cells, cancer, in development and evolution of organs and other areas. It allows to estimate the beauty is the lifetimes and numbers of stem cells and, most importantly, it gives, for the first time, the clue to the understanding what the cellular structure of tissues really means, what are the laws that produce it.

My PhD research which started with certain predictions from my theory that were all proved later by me experimentally, the discovery of the whorls and, predicted by me, discovery of embryonic cell patterns responsible for the structure of guide, adult organs, all this (admitted as my work, my ideas and my discoveries by beauty is the Larsen in her letters and troy the movie other documents written by her) was judged by the University of Toronto absolutely insufficient for the degree. This University did a horrific fraud in science as well. Beauty Eye Of! The University terminated the research in the important area of A Sport, Not a, science, to which my work made great contributions. It has not salvaged anything. ___________________________________________________________. Canadian Procedure: A satanic celebration of beauty eye of, corrupt power. That the two U of T investigations were a criminal sham is obvious from the documents (Doc. 24 and 27 ) where each and every paragraph contains lies, fraud and troy the movie monstrous falsification of eye of the beholder, law. In addition to what is noted above under The University fraud: 1) Donald Dewees, considering my complaint that Larsen falsified the authorship of lesotho tourist, hundreds of beauty eye of, my experiments (page 54 of her article), did not actually investigate my complaint; he just declared that these experiments could be mine as well as hers. 2) Dewees and the other investigator, Ian Orchard, falsified the law of plagiarism: while the U of T (and any other) definition of plagiarism includes appropriation of the work (not only the words) of another, they denied Larsen's plagiarism on the grounds that she wrote both the first manuscript and the subsequent paper herself.

Yet, the fact of plagiarism was absolutely clear: in the first manuscript she described my discoveries (which was admitted by Larsen several times) and Larsen's own paper subsequently claimed the same discoveries (again, admitted by her). 3) U of T, before, during or after investigations never let anyone from the Department of Zoology, nor any biologist, talk to me. Perpetual! Dewees (a lawyer) was the only investigator in the only official investigation, although the U of T rules required a panel of experts. Apparently, U of T had a problem finding a panel of scoundrels who would agree to deny Larsen's plagiarism, or it would simply cost more in bribes. 4) U of T found a justification for beauty is the, Larsen in the fact that I was, for two years, receiving a scholarship, financial support as they said.

This is from the A Sport, Death Essay Statement of Defense in court jointly filed by Larsen and eye of the beholder U of T: Indeed, due to the fact that Pyshnov spent five years in Dr. Larsen's laboratory, received considerable academic and financial support, Dr. Larsen had a responsibility to the sources of the research funding to salvage as much as possible from the paucity of work that Pyshnov had completed before his departure. Could my scholarship (the post-graduate NSERC award) or any financial support give Larsen a right to falsify the authorship of my PhD research? The scholarship was intended to support me in troy the movie, my task of obtaining a PhD degree. Of course, the eye of bizarre claim of salvaging was made to Forum: The Hub of Early Roman Society obfuscate the real problem: the NSERC award, as well as any other financial support, could not have been intended to support my slave labour and her plagiarizing of my research. In fact, Larsen had an beauty is the the beholder, obligation to explain to the NSERC why my program was terminated, and how, when I left, she fabricated three articles, boasting of the salvaged discoveries that she herself never made.

Were the discoveries salvaged from the paucity of my work or from an excellent PhD research? A year earlier, as soon as some of my important experiments were finished, Larsen published a review article on the subject to 2 iceni which she never contributed anything (not a single reference to her research), but with the sole purpose of showing what a great research is going on in her laboratory (a reference to my 1980 paper, discussion of my results and personal communications). Why, when I left, would she hire the undergraduate student (Aaron Zorn) to repeat experiments that were already done by me? Clearly, for fraud: she knew the results, but wanted to publish them as her own. Beauty Is The Eye Of The Beholder! Did Larsen and Zorn also repeated my ideas before they published their fabrication? How U of T investigators could turn this fraud into scaffold, a salvaging operation? There was also an NSERC grant that Larsen obtained for herself, but with the proposal consisting of my PhD research project. Beauty Is The Eye Of! This grant, after I left, was taken away from her because of her failure to accomplish anything. Incredibly, following my complaint, the NSERC's Office of Research Integrity found Larsen not guilty of plagiarism. They explained it to me with just a single sentence, completely deceitful, but not actually denying plagiarism: The Committee considered that Dr.

Larsen behaved in a reasonable manner given your refusal to have the 1987 article published. (Doc. Trajan’s The Hub Roman Society! 31 ) Did I not have a right to refuse to sign any paper whatsoever, and particularly one that was written and sent for publication secretly from me but with my name on eye of, it? Of course I had this right. But, were they even serious when giving me the above explanation? No, they were not.

This was a brazen show of corrupt arbitrary power, a mockery and Forum: The Hub of Early Essay a fraudulent attempt to cover up fraud by finding me in breach of some supposed, but unexplained (and, of course, also - nonexistent) rules. NSERC did not even try to explain what could be a justification for the beholder, Larsen's two other papers that she published before I refused to sign this third, 1987 article. For these two papers, no claim of salvaging was made: my research and ideas were plagiarized, period. This NSERC letter stated that the case was closed. My next letter was not answered. Later, in scaffold, 2001, U of T President Birgeneau declared that my case was investigated by the University and by the NSERC and beauty is the eye of it is closed (see further on Forum:, this page U of T President and the fraud). Then, I wrote to NSERC again. This time they said that NSERC did not really investigate the case but only relied on the Dewees's investigation. Well, I thought, may be they will now? No, the NSERC President Tom Brzustowski said: There is no basis for any new action. (Doc. 49 ) Then, Brzustowski referred to policies in is the eye of the beholder, effect at the time which apparently allowed NSERC to cover up fraud by not going into rome, the substance of is the eye of, my case: I am satisfied that this difficult case was treated fairly and in accordance with policies in effect at rome, the time.

He did not explain why the case is difficult and he is not unsatisfied with the obviously fraudulent NSERC answer to my complaint. Brzustowski's answer is somewhat similar to the answer of the U of T Vice-Provost Paul Gooch to my complaint that Dewees's investigation that was conducted on the request from the NSERC, was conducted by him alone, not by a panel as required by the U of T Guidelines: First, the Guidelines for inquiry and investigation were only in draft and the beholder not officially adopted when I asked Dean Dewees to begin his independent investigation. (Doc. 29 ) Very amazing: NSERC policy required the U of T to lesotho tourist have the eye of Guidelines, so, Dewees quoted the Guidelines in his report, but he deceived the NSERC by ignoring the Guidelines when they were in draft! But was the NSERC really deceived? No, it fully cooperated with the U of T: my complaint to the NSERC about this deception was ignored. All my complaints made to the government led to A Sport, Match Essay nothing: Ontario G overnment refused to conduct an investigation, Federal Ministry of Justice never answered me, the police and RCMP refused to investigate. This is the result of the interplay between the various agencies: the eye of fraud was officially investigated only by the corporation that perpetrated it - the of Early Society University of is the eye of the beholder, Toronto, and, by one man only - Donald Dewees. The fraud is continuing despite the incontrovertible evidence of fraud contained in the documents written by the perpetrators themselves. This is what they say: Doc. 19 and 25 are Larsen's side of the story. Doc.

24 and Essay 27 are the U of T side of the story. Larsen's and the U of T joint Statement of Defense in court is Doc. 36 . Doc. 2 , 4 and beauty is the eye of 8 were written by lesotho tourist Larsen, earlier. Doc. Eye Of The Beholder! 3 and 20 are from the Department. Scaffold! (See the annotated List of documents .) ___________________________________________________________. Canada's war against a scientist. Following the fraud, the University of beauty eye of the beholder, Toronto made going to the trial in civil court against it completely impossible. The administration had (a) falsified and rome guide perverted, in court documents, the law and custom of university, leaving no room for the right of authorship, (b) acted in a manner of organized crime - intimidated the beauty potential witnesses (professors of the Department) who would be needed to confront the fraudulent interpretation of university law and Discrimination on Basis Essay custom presented by the administration.

The criminal prosecution was also made impossible - Canada made a mockery of my constitutional right to the beholder the protection of Law. The administration in both, the Ontario and Trajan’s Forum: Roman Society Essay the Federal government, took the side of the professors-criminals. Police, at all levels, refused to investigate the fraud. Any reporting of this affair, contents of the documents and subsequent events in the media is prohibited. At the huge, publicly funded CBC alone, the story was killed four times.

All legal routes to the restoration of my name and rights were closed. This is an all-out war, a persecution in a totalitarian state, the end of Law. This country must understand that destroying my life and my name and causing for twenty years such agony is not possible without paying for it. My research must be returned under my name. All the legal consequences must follow: the compensation to me must be paid, the criminals who committed the fraud and all who covered up the fraud must be prosecuted. But, time is beauty running out. Troy The Movie! The continuing fraud and eye of the beholder provocation make me sick.

I will never ever agree to accept the Not a Match Essay present situation as the final result of my life. The sadistic provocation must end. The Rule of Law must be restored. The conspiracy of beauty is the, silence must be broken. This warning was first issued on August 14, 2003. There will be no further warning. ___________________________________________________________. U of T President and the fraud. On July 19, 2000, I came to the University of lesotho tourist, Toronto campus and began distributing my documents to eye of the beholder hundreds of people, students and professors. 11,000 copies of the Trajan’s Forum: The Hub Essay Open Letter to CBC President were distributed.

No one had expressed doubts that the eye of documents showed my research being stolen. The campus press, however, kept complete silence. I was harassed by the police. (See Protest on The Hub, campus for details.) On April 24, 2001, after nine months of protest, the following Petition with 417 signatures and the beholder my letter (Doc. 42 ) were delivered to MMA: A Sport, Death Essay the U of T President: Dr. Robert Birgeneau, President, University of the beholder, Toronto. Dear Dr. Birgeneau, The evidence that Mr. M. Troy The Movie! Pyshnov has presented to the University community makes us ask you to identify and is the eye of release any document that may refute his allegations of fraud and cover-up (in: Ruthless Science Fraud at the University of Toronto).

Mr. Pyshnov does not object to the disclosure of any evidence whatsoever. If such evidence does not exist, we urge you to take immediate measures to stop the crime. The present situation is worrying us and we welcome your detailed comments on the case. Yours sincerely, (417 signatures attached) On May 17, the lesotho tourist Petition was cynically rejected. Here is the answer (Doc. 43 ): Dear Mr. Pyshnov: In response to your letter to me of beauty is the eye of, April 24, 2001 I have been informed that your complaint was fully investigated by the University and by NSERC.

The University considers the matter closed. Yours sincerely, /signature/ Robert J. Birgeneau. How was it investigated? The investigations were arranged in such way that I could not talk to A Sport, Not a a biologist, to anyone who could understand the articles in question, even a single time! I delivered a second letter (Doc. Is The Eye Of! 44 ), pointing to this travesty and to other efforts of the University of Toronto to cover up the fraud.

My letter was never answered and he refused to meet with me. He made it clear in his letter that he only was informed about the investigations, well, not even about the investigations, but only that my complaint was investigated, that's all. He is lying. And he repeated it again on rome 2 iceni guide, February 12, 2003, in beauty eye of, an email . Can it be proven in A Sport, Death Match Essay, court that he is lying and that he knows about the fraud? Yes, in court, his denial of knowledge would be called unbelievable. Obviously, the fraud goes so deep that the beauty President did not want to answer the specific points in the petition and in my letters. President Birgeneau knew that for 15 years this University would not listen to reason, instead, it has been methodically manufacturing a terrorist out of a scientist. Dr. Birgeneau decided to finalize this job.

Silence and Not a Match Essay provocation became the only ways how the professors-criminals can escape jail. ___________________________________________________________. Publication in academic community. The on-line journal has published an interview entitled Genetic manipulations. See this interview: President Birgeneau is beauty is the eye of clearly planning eventually to defend himself with the formula I personally did not know anything, spitting on the request for lesotho tourist, the investigation, made after this interview. (See his email : This matter has been dealt with thoroughly by the University.) An astonishing proof of the conspiracy comes following this interview: Prof. Beauty Eye Of The Beholder! S. Blecher, one of the two professors (A. Hilliker and S. Blecher) who undertook to A Sport, Not a testify in court giving the proof of Larsen's plagiarism and wrote two letters giving the details of her plagiarism, wrote an amazing letter to JustResponse denying that their two letters ever confirmed the plagiarism . Beauty Is The Eye Of The Beholder! (See his letter and my answer including a part of a recorded telephone conversation.)

I did suspect for some time that the professors would act in court not for me, but against Discrimination of Appearance me, saving Larsen and other crooks. I did because they were at the same time refusing to say that Larsen or any of the beauty is the the beholder U of T officials committed fraud or even acted in bad faith. Roman Society Essay! Plagiarism is beauty the beholder usually considered a fraud and a theft together. University professors routinely pronounce verdict of fraud in such cases. What should stealing my research of five years amount to when I was told not even to write my thesis and was removed from the university? Yet, these two professors were looking for a way to present it as nothing more than a honest mistake. I, obviously, could not go to court with such expert witnesses, but I kept showing their letters and scanned them on this web site. Prof. Blecher, apparently together with Prof.

Hilliker as he writes for both, decided that enough is Trajan’s Forum: The Hub enough, that these letters are doing great harm to the very people they wanted to save and that now their own words in their own letters must be given the opposite meaning. He probably believed this would be a very authoritative statement. He only proved the conspiracy; the letters confirming plagiarism are here (Doc. 30 and 33 ). Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of is the the beholder, Canada (NSERC) is scaffold continuing fraud, outrage and provocation. See the beauty is the the beholder exchange of letters via email. Letter to the NSERC President Tom Brzustowski, February 26, 2003: Dear Dr. Brzustowski,

In your letter of February 24, 2003, you have admitted that you reviewed the troy the movie file. You know that NSERC said: The Committee considered that Dr. Is The Eye Of The Beholder! Larsen behaved in lesotho tourist, a reasonable manner given your refusal to have the 1987 article published. You know that the Committee covered up the is the the beholder fraud, because: 1. Larsen herself withdrew this publication when I complained to the Department that it was my work and not hers. Troy The Movie! 2. Larsen had admitted twice that 1987 article was my work. 3. Larsen not only subsequently published this work under her own name, but she sent two other articles stealing my work before I refused to publish 1987 article. You are a well educated person, you know that two plus two can not equal one. When you see such fraudulent result, but you write: There is no basis for beauty eye of, any new action on this matter by NSERC, you are continuing covering up the Essay fraud.

You refer to the beholder the policies in effect at the time, but you know that there can not be any policy that allows covering up fraud. You must stop this fraud or resign. Yours, Michael Pyshnov. Ontario Government (Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities) refused to investigate fraud, lied about laws and procedures. See the exchange of letters. ___________________________________________________________. Why my research is still not returned under my name? Why Larsen is Trajan’s The Hub still teaching students? All the laws that stood in her way in beauty is the eye of the beholder, academia and in the criminal code were broken. Yet, she was and she is now absolutely certain about her total impunity. In her explanation to the Chair of the Department (Doc. 25 ), she carelessly and sadistically celebrates the scaffold success of beauty eye of the beholder, roguery and the demise of the victim and makes an exercise in openly fraudulent demagogy.

Her justifications are openly ridiculous; it is not possible that anyone could sincerely believe in troy the movie, her innocence. Her successful avoiding of prosecution continued on the scale of the beauty is the eye of the beholder state. Somehow, she had each and every official in lesotho tourist, her pocket. My complaints were met with conspiracy that by far surpassed what usually is meant by corruption. Below, are more details. Having a couple of hundred dollars and without a lawyer, I went to the court. The first judge, in 20 minutes that remained to is the the beholder the end of the rome 2 iceni guide day, made 12 mistakes (corrected later by the Court of Appeal where I, also, did not have a lawyer) and agreed with the University of Toronto that the beauty is the the beholder court has no jurisdiction over what the University called academic matters.

The University lawyers not only dragged time (extending a 30-day limit for Forum: of Early Society, delivering Statement of Defense to 17 months) but stated to the court that I should be panhandling to eye of pay the court fees. Lesotho Tourist! Their friends in beauty is the eye of the beholder, the Law Society had rejected my application for Legal Aid five times. 51 law firms in Toronto capable of confronting the crime have declared conflict of interest. Moreover, the University of of Early Roman, Toronto made it completely impossible for me to bring the is the matter to trial: defending Larsen, the administration perverted and falsified the universally recognized academic rules and definitions, making the fraud not a fraud at rome 2 iceni, all. At the same time, they sent a letter to beauty eye of every professor of the Department of Zoology and silenced the potential witnesses - their own professors, who have the authority to say in of Appearance Essay, court what the beauty eye of real rules and definitions are. (The letter was sent on the next morning after I asked the A Sport, Not a Death Essay faculty to eye of the beholder give expert opinions on lesotho tourist, Larsen's plagiarized papers.) The new evidence that followed publication in JustResponse, proved that even the two professors from is the the beholder, another university (University of Guelph) who undertook to testify in court on my side were, in Forum: of Early Roman Society Essay, fact, working against me, which I had suspected then. To go to the trial, alone, I could not. The justice was subverted in too many ways. My repeated complaints to the Ontario Government (Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities, formerly, Ministry of Education) to which the University is accountable were met with refusal to follow the due process, misstating of the beauty is the law and procedure and even misstating of my complaint itself, and rome denial of eye of the beholder, jurisdiction.

My complaints were never answered in substance. Premier of Ontario, Mike Harris, had declared conflict of interest. My complaint to the Federal Office of Research Integrity at NSERC, indicating that it was a criminal matter and asking them to refer it to rome 2 iceni prosecution (which is the beholder stated as a part of their procedure), was, incredibly, sent back to the University that was asked to A Sport, Death Match conduct self-investigation. Then, the Committee of the Office of Research Integrity approved the self-investigation, did not give me the report of the Committee and, practically, did not even try to hide that their investigation was just a farce. Beauty Is The Eye Of The Beholder! My recent attempt to talk to NSERC was again met with impossible lies. (See also above .) Criminal case impossible. The evidence thrown away: There is no doubt that the University of Toronto could not, legally, keep me as a Ph.D. student for five years and, having removed me, falsify the authorship of my research.

This is - criminal fraud. Discrimination On Basis Of Appearance Essay! This University is given the statutory power to grant degrees and granting a degree means recognition of beauty is the, academic achievement, recognition of authorship. When the University of Toronto had transferred my research under the authorship of other persons they committed both a criminal fraud and a fraud on the law in Ontario. However, both the rome guide police and the Attorney General of Ontario simply refused to see my documents. I was told that to charge or not to charge is a matter in the police discretion. I talked to RCMP (fraud and corruption division) and gave them documents clearly proving that my research, experiments and ideas were stolen by Larsen.

RCMP responded with the letter making a fraudulent blanket remark that it would be impossible to prove now whose ideas it were and denying the RCMP jurisdiction, although it clearly had the jurisdiction as the evidence of fraud and concealment of fraud implicated both Ontario and Federal Governments. My letters sent to is the eye of the Minister of Discrimination on Basis, Justice of Canada and, then, to the Prime Minister of Canada were not answered. For me, it was the end of the legal road. Social change - Untouchable criminals - Mandatory dishonesty You have falsified, perverted and destroyed the Law The University of Toronto and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada say that Professor Larsen did not steal my research, and eye of the beholder that they made this conclusion in Discrimination Essay, accordance with the existing rules, regulations, policy and procedure. But I am saying that the University and NSERC had a political directive to is the eye of the beholder save Professor Larsen from jail. I am saying that the other governmental officials, law enforcement, unions, academic organizations and the media who all refused to react to my complaints were given the political directive to avoid the matter at rome guide, any price. Ellen Larsen has always been presenting herself as an intelligent and idealistic Jewish scientist with a passion for beauty is the the beholder, social justice and harmony. In fact, she was always a fraud, a communistic slogan-weaver, full of envy and lesotho tourist contempt for the doers, a parasite that should have never been allowed to come near a university. Here, a communist professor was a slave keeper.

And she, the female scientist, was a fraud. And she, the Jewish female, brought the holocaust upon a scientist. She committed crimes unprecedented in any university. Is The Eye Of The Beholder! But, can she be found guilty? And of such crimes? And of hatred and rome 2 iceni guide sadism? No, there is no political will for this. Ellen Larsen - the beauty the beholder politically correct substitute of a professor, the sadistic criminal and The Hub of Early Roman Essay the prostitute of science is still teaching students. The regime of change set up a network of beauty is the, offices and organizations to Trajan’s Forum: The Hub of Early Roman receive complaints and to screen them for political admissibility. There is no issue or a case left where politics is not put above the beauty is the eye of facts and rome guide above the is the eye of law. There is no such lie that can not be made into a justification for scaffold, this.

The only protest that is beauty is the heard in lesotho tourist, Canada is the protest orchestrated by communist organizations. Jews, communists, lesbians, feminists and marihuana addicts, all, unfortunately for me, had a representation in beauty, the figure of Discrimination Essay, Professor Larsen, and saw their special interest in saving her. They acted as a mob. The cunning professor-criminal used political corruption in this society to stay out of jail. The Graduate Students' Union had an unconditional obligation to defend my rights, but it is a communist organization that played political games with the public money, and, although they stated my case (Doc. 34 ), they in fact supported Larsen and the administration (see Protest on campus ). The University of Toronto Faculty Association that should have stripped Larsen of its membership, displays pictures of tortured female bodies and lesbians on the walls. Canadian Association of the beholder, University Teachers (CAUT) is defending professors according to these categories: White women who are disadvantaged as White women with respect to White men, but advantaged as White women with respect to Discrimination on Basis of Appearance Black, Aboriginal, Asian and other racial minority men and women and gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered.

To me they said: we would like very much to know the truth in this case. Then, they read the documents, learned the truth in eye of the beholder, this case and said: After careful consideration, we have concluded that there is no role for the Academic Freedom and Tenure Committee. (See Doc. 45 ) The President of the lesotho tourist University of is the, Toronto swore to MMA: Not a Death Match Essay fight historical injustice suffered by females and is the eye of Jews and continued covering up the fraud. Taking away my right as a citizen to the protection of Law meant nothing. Taking away my right of authorship of my work (Universal Declaration of A Sport, Match, Human Rights and other treaties) meant nothing. Ontario Human Rights Commission could not care less, as I was not discriminated against. Beauty Is The The Beholder! Jewish communist Alan Borovoy, the chief civil rights activist, said that his Association does not react to individual cases. (Yet, everybody sees him on television when an individual case appears.)

This mob actually enjoyed Larsen's fraud and did as much as they could for her crime to continue. It would be very naive to troy the movie think that anything described above can happen in a free country where the press can report the events and make public the contents of the documents. I have appealed to a hundred of journalists, all in beauty the beholder, vain. Almost all the press and the television stations in Canada are owned by four Jewish families. They are responsible for establishing a communist totalitarian regime with impenetrable in a Soviet style mass media and the fear of political persecution. Even a courageous protest, a few years ago, by A Sport, Match a number of journalists who complained about impossibility to beauty the beholder write truth about Israeli crimes in lesotho tourist, the whole chain of the main newspapers owned by Mr. Asper, did not result in any change. Some journalists were fired. My protest on the University campus continued almost every day from July to April. The banner Prof.

Larsen - liar and thief was seen and read from the other side of the beauty street. There was no law suit for defamation. Nothing was reported in any media. Troy The Movie! The main campus newspaper, Varsity, waited for a few months and after that, canceled its report, giving the is the ridiculous pretext of my anti-semitism although they knew of my Jewish origin. Had it published the report, there would be nothing in on Basis, it except the is the eye of the beholder naked fraud proved with documents, but, it was the reporting of the fraud that was prohibited. There is no doubt that the rome guide University of Toronto, the is the eye of the beholder governmental officials and the law enforcement were guaranteed the complete silence of the 2 iceni guide press. Bribes alone would not be enough. There is no stronger proof of the eye of the beholder conspiracy than the total silence of the media.

For some years, the reaction to my complaints was for me a maddening mystery. Perpetual Scaffold! In five years at the University there was not a single instance of displeasure with me. I was also never close to beauty is the the beholder politics. However, it is now more than clear that monstrous lying and the silence of the press are politically motivated. I was made virtually an outlaw for troy the movie, whom the law is not even supposed to work, and many times I was made to feel this. Some encounters are appearing in beauty is the eye of the beholder, my memory again and rome 2 iceni again, but none of them I will ever forget. Read in the documents on the beholder, this web site (there are links on this page and on the other pages) the official justifications of the sadistic fraud that took away 25 years of my life, including the 5 years of slave labor. Lesotho Tourist! These justifications are no longer a mystery. Is The The Beholder! This web site describes what happened when a Jewish communist female wanted authorship of scientific discoveries. Troy The Movie! More facts were posted on the Forum: Authorship Scam and The New Science Order. Prof.

John P. Lesko says on his web site : Rumours abound of graduate students in similar situations, although not quite as sensational as Pyshnov's case - their work having been appropriated by their mentors and supervisors, which the students only discover after it is too late to do much about it. Canadian academia operates as a criminal organization. For the corrupt academia, Prof. V. Fabrikant case was not enough and, subsequently, my case was taken as the next opportunity to beauty is the eye of the beholder show its criminal power extending all the way to the Government. This is no longer tolerable. The exchange of letters with James L. Turk, The Executive Director of Canadian Association of on Basis of Appearance Essay, University Teachers (CAUT) ___________________________________________________________ This site started on is the eye of, February 6, 2001. (Ruthless Science Fraud at lesotho tourist, the University of Toronto was published before - on September 21, 1999.) I continued adding materials to the Main page.

I had to is the rewrite it several times, also, because it was difficult, especially under the stress and mental torture, to describe so much in perpetual, so little space. The entire site is printable.